Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm X100T
96 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33
80 Imaging
59 Features
63 Overall
60
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm X100T Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 155g - 87 x 54 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
- Alternative Name is IXUS 500 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 51200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 440g - 127 x 74 x 52mm
- Launched September 2014
- Superseded the Fujifilm X100S
- Later Model is Fujifilm X100F
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm X100T Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Canon ELPH 520 HS and Fujifilm X100T, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Canon and FujiFilm. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the ELPH 520 HS (10MP) and Fujifilm X100T (16MP) and the ELPH 520 HS (1/2.3") and Fujifilm X100T (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe ELPH 520 HS was revealed 3 years earlier than the Fujifilm X100T and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Canon ELPH 520 HS being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm X100T being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the ELPH 520 HS matches up against the Fujifilm X100T when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm X100T Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon ELPH 520 HS & Fujifilm X100T. The full galleries are viewable at Canon ELPH 520 HS Gallery & Fujifilm X100T Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 520 HS over the Fujifilm X100T
ELPH 520 HS | Fujifilm X100T |
---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X100T over the Canon ELPH 520 HS
Fujifilm X100T | ELPH 520 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2014 | January 2012 | More recent by 32 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 1040k | 461k | Crisper screen (+579k dot) |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 520 HS and Fujifilm X100T
ELPH 520 HS | Fujifilm X100T | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm X100T Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon ELPH 520 HS comes with physical dimensions of 87mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Fujifilm X100T has proportions of 127mm x 74mm x 52mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.0") having a weight of 440 grams (0.97 lbs).
Examine the Canon ELPH 520 HS and Fujifilm X100T in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the ELPH 520 HS and the Fujifilm X100T.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ELPH 520 HS and Fujifilm X100T is 96 and 80 respectively.
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm X100T Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading through a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 520 HS and Fujifilm X100T.
Clearly, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The ELPH 520 HS using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Fujifilm X100T will give you extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The older ELPH 520 HS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm X100T Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm X100T Specifications
Canon ELPH 520 HS | Fujifilm X100T | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model | Canon ELPH 520 HS | Fujifilm X100T |
Alternative name | IXUS 500 HS | - |
Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-01-09 | 2014-09-12 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 5 | EXR Processor II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS X-TRANS II |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.0 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | PureColor II G TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 92 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 2.50 m | 9.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, forced, suppressed, slow synchro, commander |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) | 440 gr (0.97 pounds) |
Dimensions | 87 x 54 x 19mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 127 x 74 x 52mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 190 shots | 330 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-9L | NP-95 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $279 | $899 |