Clicky

Canon 1D MII vs Olympus E-500

Portability
50
Imaging
47
Features
38
Overall
43
Canon EOS-1D Mark II front
 
Olympus E-500 front
Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38

Canon 1D MII vs Olympus E-500 Key Specs

Canon 1D MII
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - APS-H Sensor
  • 2" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Canon EF Mount
  • 1565g - 156 x 158 x 80mm
  • Introduced June 2004
  • Previous Model is Canon 1D
  • Later Model is Canon 1D MII N
Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Announced October 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-500
  • New Model is Olympus E-510
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon 1D MII vs Olympus E-500 Overview

Here is a extensive analysis of the Canon 1D MII and Olympus E-500, former being a Pro DSLR while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the 1D MII (8MP) and the E-500 (8MP) is relatively comparable but the 1D MII (APS-H) and E-500 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The 1D MII was revealed 16 months before the E-500 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Canon 1D MII being a Large SLR camera and the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the 1D MII grades vs the E-500 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon 1D MII over the Olympus E-500

 1D MII E-500 
Screen resolution230k215kClearer screen (+15k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Canon 1D MII

 E-500 1D MII 
AnnouncedOctober 2005June 2004Fresher by 16 months
Screen size2.5"2"Bigger screen (+0.5")

Common features in the Canon 1D MII and Olympus E-500

 1D MII E-500 
Manually focus Very precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Canon 1D MII vs Olympus E-500 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry your camera, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Canon 1D MII provides outside measurements of 156mm x 158mm x 80mm (6.1" x 6.2" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 1565 grams (3.45 lbs) and the Olympus E-500 has sizing of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs).

Look at the Canon 1D MII and Olympus E-500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the 1D MII against the E-500.

Canon 1D MII vs Olympus E-500 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the 1D MII and E-500 is 50 and 70 respectively.

Canon 1D MII vs Olympus E-500 top view buttons comparison

Canon 1D MII vs Olympus E-500 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizing just by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the 1D MII and E-500.

Clearly, both of these cameras come with the identical resolution albeit different sensor sizing. The 1D MII comes with the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow depth of field simpler. The older 1D MII will be behind in sensor tech.

Canon 1D MII vs Olympus E-500 sensor size comparison

Canon 1D MII vs Olympus E-500 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon 1D MII vs Olympus E-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon 1D MII Portrait photography highlights
Olympus E-500 Portrait photography highlights
52
focusing manually
decent sensor size (APS-H)
delivers RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
49
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
does not have liveview
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon 1D MII
Street photography with Olympus E-500
45
decent sensor size (APS-H)
delivers RAW formats
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than others in class (1,565 grams)
57
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competitors (479g)
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon 1D MII
Sports photography with Olympus E-500
48
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
decent sensor size (APS-H)
has phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
does not have liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Canon 1D MII as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-500 as a Travel photography camera
29
more heavy than others in class (1,565g)
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
52
lighter than competitors (479g)
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Canon 1D MII Landscape photography factors
Olympus E-500 Landscape photography factors
48
focusing manually
swap lenses (Canon EF mount)
decent sensor size (APS-H)
delivers RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2 inches)
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
43
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (2.5")
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
does not have Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Canon 1D MII as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-500 as a Vlogging camera
9
can't shoot video
9
can't shoot video
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon 1D MII vs Olympus E-500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon 1D MII and Olympus E-500
 Canon EOS-1D Mark IIOlympus E-500
General Information
Make Canon Olympus
Model Canon EOS-1D Mark II Olympus E-500
Also referred to as - EVOLT E-500
Category Pro DSLR Advanced DSLR
Introduced 2004-06-14 2005-10-21
Physical type Large SLR Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-H Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 28.7 x 19.1mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 548.2mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 8 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Peak resolution 3504 x 2336 3264 x 2448
Highest native ISO 3200 400
Highest enhanced ISO - 1600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 45 3
Lens
Lens mount Canon EF Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 250 45
Crop factor 1.3 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2" 2.5"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 215k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.72x 0.45x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 9.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 13.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes External Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250 seconds 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Highest video resolution None None
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 1565g (3.45 lb) 479g (1.06 lb)
Physical dimensions 156 x 158 x 80mm (6.1" x 6.2" x 3.1") 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 66 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 22.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.1 not tested
DXO Low light score 1003 not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), SD card Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $6,500 $600