Clicky

Canon 1Ds vs Kodak M320

Portability
50
Imaging
52
Features
34
Overall
44
Canon EOS-1Ds front
 
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23

Canon 1Ds vs Kodak M320 Key Specs

Canon 1Ds
(Full Review)
  • 11MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1250
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Canon EF Mount
  • 1585g - 156 x 158 x 80mm
  • Announced December 2002
  • Replacement is Canon 1Ds MII
Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon 1Ds vs Kodak M320 Overview

Below is a thorough assessment of the Canon 1Ds versus Kodak M320, former being a Pro DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Kodak. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the 1Ds (11MP) and M320 (9MP) and the 1Ds (Full frame) and M320 (1/2.5") feature totally different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The 1Ds was announced 7 years prior to the M320 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Canon 1Ds being a Large SLR camera and the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the 1Ds matches up against the M320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon 1Ds over the Kodak M320

 1Ds M320 
Focus manually Very precise focus

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Canon 1Ds

 M320 1Ds 
IntroducedJanuary 2009December 2002More recent by 73 months
Screen sizing2.7"2"Bigger screen (+0.7")
Screen resolution230k120kClearer screen (+110k dot)

Common features in the Canon 1Ds and Kodak M320

 1Ds M320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Canon 1Ds vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Canon 1Ds enjoys outer measurements of 156mm x 158mm x 80mm (6.1" x 6.2" x 3.1") and a weight of 1585 grams (3.49 lbs) while the Kodak M320 has specifications of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon 1Ds versus Kodak M320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the 1Ds versus the M320.

Canon 1Ds vs Kodak M320 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the 1Ds and M320 is 50 and 95 respectively.

Canon 1Ds vs Kodak M320 top view buttons comparison

Canon 1Ds vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements only by reading through technical specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the 1Ds and M320.

As you can tell, both of those cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The 1Ds with its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Canon 1Ds will give you more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older 1Ds is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Canon 1Ds vs Kodak M320 sensor size comparison

Canon 1Ds vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon 1Ds vs Kodak M320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon 1Ds Portrait photography features
Kodak M320 Portrait photography features
55
focusing manually
great sensor size (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
no liveview feature
MP count low (11MP)
19
manual focus not available
no manual mode
external flash not possible
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon 1Ds
Street photography with Kodak M320
44
great sensor size (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
heavier than competition (1,585 grams)
low max ISO (1,250)
47
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
more heavy than competitors (155g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Canon 1Ds Sports photography highlights
Kodak M320 Sports photography highlights
47
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
great sensor size (Full frame)
has phase detect AF
no liveview feature
max fps low (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
MP count low (11 megapixels)
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (9MP)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Canon 1Ds as a Travel photography camera
Kodak M320 as a Travel photography camera
30
heavier than competition (1,585 grams)
MP count low (11 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
50
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (155g)
low megapixels (9MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Canon 1Ds as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak M320 as a Landscape photography camera
48
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Canon EF mount)
great sensor size (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
small screen (2")
no liveview feature
no image stabilization
MP count low (11MP)
low max ISO (1,250)
22
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Canon 1Ds Vlogging highlights
Kodak M320 Vlogging highlights
9
can't shoot video
22
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone support
more heavy than competitors (155g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon 1Ds vs Kodak M320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon 1Ds and Kodak M320
 Canon EOS-1DsKodak EasyShare M320
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Kodak
Model type Canon EOS-1Ds Kodak EasyShare M320
Class Pro DSLR Ultracompact
Announced 2002-12-17 2009-01-08
Physical type Large SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Full frame 1/2.5"
Sensor measurements 35.8 x 23.8mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 852.0mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 11MP 9MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4064 x 2704 3472 x 2604
Maximum native ISO 1250 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 45 25
Lens
Lens support Canon EF fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 34-102mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-5.1
Macro focusing range - 10cm
Amount of lenses 250 -
Focal length multiplier 1 6.3
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 120k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.7x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/1400 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.00 m
Flash modes External Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 1585 gr (3.49 lb) 155 gr (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 156 x 158 x 80mm (6.1" x 6.2" x 3.1") 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 63 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.0 not tested
DXO Low light rating 954 not tested
Other
Battery ID - KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Price at launch $9,000 $39