Canon 400D vs Canon M200
69 Imaging
48 Features
33 Overall
42
88 Imaging
70 Features
80 Overall
74
Canon 400D vs Canon M200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 556g - 127 x 94 x 65mm
- Announced October 2006
- Additionally referred to as EOS Digital Rebel XTi / EOS Kiss Digital X
- Superseded the Canon 350D
- Renewed by Canon 450D
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Introduced September 2019
- Succeeded the Canon M100
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon 400D vs Canon M200 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Canon 400D vs Canon M200, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are designed by Canon. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the 400D (10MP) and M200 (24MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (APS-C).
Photography GlossaryThe 400D was introduced 14 years prior to the M200 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Canon 400D being a Compact SLR camera and the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the 400D matches up vs the M200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon 400D vs Canon M200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon EOS 400D and Canon EOS M200. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon 400D Gallery and Canon M200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon 400D over the Canon M200
| 400D | M200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Canon 400D
| M200 | 400D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2019 |  | October 2006 | More recent by 157 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon 400D and Canon M200
| 400D | M200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus |
Canon 400D vs Canon M200 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon 400D enjoys physical dimensions of 127mm x 94mm x 65mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 556 grams (1.23 lbs) whilst the Canon M200 has dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
See the Canon 400D vs Canon M200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the 400D compared to the M200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 400D and M200 is 69 and 88 respectively.
Canon 400D vs Canon M200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements purely by reviewing specifications. The graphic here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the 400D and M200.
Plainly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Canon M200 to offer more detail using its extra 14MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older 400D is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon 400D vs Canon M200 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Canon 400D vs Canon M200 Specifications
| Canon EOS 400D | Canon EOS M200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Canon |
| Model | Canon EOS 400D | Canon EOS M200 |
| Other name | EOS Digital Rebel XTi / EOS Kiss Digital X | - |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2006-10-14 | 2019-09-25 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | DIGIC 8 |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 22.2 x 14.8mm | 22.3 x 14.9mm |
| Sensor area | 328.6mm² | 332.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 24MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3888 x 2592 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Canon EF/EF-S | Canon EF-M |
| Amount of lenses | 326 | 23 |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.5x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 6.1fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (ISO 100) | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Red-eye reduction, Off | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/200 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
| Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 556 gr (1.23 lbs) | 299 gr (0.66 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 127 x 94 x 65mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 62 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.1 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.0 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 664 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 315 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LP-E12 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec (2 sec with mirror lock-up)) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $600 | $549 |
