Canon 400D vs Samsung WB800F
69 Imaging
48 Features
33 Overall
42
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Canon 400D vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 556g - 127 x 94 x 65mm
- Announced October 2006
- Also referred to as EOS Digital Rebel XTi / EOS Kiss Digital X
- Previous Model is Canon 350D
- Updated by Canon 450D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Canon 400D vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets look more closely at the Canon 400D versus Samsung WB800F, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Canon and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the 400D (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the 400D (APS-C) and WB800F (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's DominanceThe 400D was introduced 7 years before the WB800F and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Canon 400D being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the 400D matches up against the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Canon 400D vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS 400D & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon 400D Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon 400D over the Samsung WB800F
400D | WB800F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Canon 400D
WB800F | 400D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | October 2006 | Fresher by 75 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon 400D and Samsung WB800F
400D | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Canon 400D vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Canon 400D offers physical dimensions of 127mm x 94mm x 65mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 556 grams (1.23 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Canon 400D versus Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the 400D against the WB800F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the 400D and WB800F is 69 and 92 respectively.
Canon 400D vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at specs. The visual here may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 400D and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The 400D with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung WB800F will give greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older 400D is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon 400D vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon 400D vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Canon EOS 400D | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Samsung |
Model | Canon EOS 400D | Samsung WB800F |
Also Known as | EOS Digital Rebel XTi / EOS Kiss Digital X | - |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2006-10-14 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 22.2 x 14.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 328.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
Full resolution | 3888 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Canon EF/EF-S | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Total lenses | 326 | - |
Crop factor | 1.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.5x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Red-eye reduction, Off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/200 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 556 grams (1.23 lb) | 218 grams (0.48 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 127 x 94 x 65mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 62 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 664 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (10 sec (2 sec with mirror lock-up)) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $600 | $300 |