Clicky

Canon M10 vs Olympus E-400

Portability
88
Imaging
62
Features
70
Overall
65
Canon EOS M10 front
 
Olympus E-400 front
Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38

Canon M10 vs Olympus E-400 Key Specs

Canon M10
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 301g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
  • Released October 2015
  • Updated by Canon M100
Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched September 2006
  • New Model is Olympus E-410
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon M10 vs Olympus E-400 Overview

The following is a in depth comparison of the Canon M10 vs Olympus E-400, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Canon and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the M10 (18MP) and E-400 (10MP) and the M10 (APS-C) and E-400 (Four Thirds) come with totally different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The M10 was introduced 9 years after the E-400 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Canon M10 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the M10 grades vs the E-400 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon M10 over the Olympus E-400

 M10 E-400 
LaunchedOctober 2015September 2006Newer by 111 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1040k215kClearer display (+825k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Canon M10

 E-400 M10 

Common features in the Canon M10 and Olympus E-400

 M10 E-400 
Focus manually More precise focus

Canon M10 vs Olympus E-400 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon M10 offers outer measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 301 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Olympus E-400 has measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).

Check the Canon M10 vs Olympus E-400 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the M10 against the E-400.

Canon M10 vs Olympus E-400 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M10 and E-400 is 88 and 77 respectively.

Canon M10 vs Olympus E-400 top view buttons comparison

Canon M10 vs Olympus E-400 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading technical specs. The picture here might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the M10 and E-400.

As you can tell, both of those cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M10 using its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Canon M10 will deliver more detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher M10 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon M10 vs Olympus E-400 sensor size comparison

Canon M10 vs Olympus E-400 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M10 vs Olympus E-400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon M10 Portrait photography info
Olympus E-400 Portrait photography info
70
you can focus manually
good resolution (18MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
cannot use external flash
46
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
lack of manual exposure
MP count low (10MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Canon M10 Street photography info
Olympus E-400 Street photography info
79
has a tilting screen
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
provides touch focus
no image stabilization
60
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon M10
Sports photography with Olympus E-400
59
good resolution (18 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
provides tracking autofocus
comes with phase detect AF
continuous shooting slow (4.6 frames/s)
no image stabilization
terrible battery pack (255 per charge)
38
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Canon M10 Travel photography information
Olympus E-400 Travel photography information
74
provides touch focus
good resolution (18 megapixels)
built-in flash
selfie friendly screen
does not have Timelapse mode
terrible battery pack (255 shots)
49
has built in flash
no Time Lapse recording
MP count low (10 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Canon M10 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-400 as a Landscape photography camera
66
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
good resolution (18MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no image stabilization
terrible battery pack (255 shots)
does not have Timelapse mode
45
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
small screen (2.5")
doesn't have liveview
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
no Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M10 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-400 as a Vlogging camera
74
selfie friendly screen
touch screen
provides face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
no image stabilization
does not have external microphone support
9
no video
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Canon M10 vs Olympus E-400 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M10 and Olympus E-400
 Canon EOS M10Olympus E-400
General Information
Make Canon Olympus
Model type Canon EOS M10 Olympus E-400
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2015-10-12 2006-09-14
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by DIGIC 6 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 22.3 x 14.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 332.3mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 18MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 5184 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 12800 1600
Highest enhanced ISO 25600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 49 3
Lens
Lens mount type Canon EF-M Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 23 45
Focal length multiplier 1.6 2.1
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 2.5 inch
Resolution of display 1,040k dot 215k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.46x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 4.6 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.00 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, on, off, slow synchro Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 301 gr (0.66 lb) 435 gr (0.96 lb)
Dimensions 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 65 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 22.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.0 not tested
DXO Low light rating 753 not tested
Other
Battery life 255 photographs -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID LP-E12 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $599 $599