Canon M200 vs Casio EX-FC150
88 Imaging
70 Features
80 Overall
74
93 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
Canon M200 vs Casio EX-FC150 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Introduced September 2019
- Succeeded the Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-185mm (F3.6-4.5) lens
- 173g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced November 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon M200 vs Casio EX-FC150 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Canon M200 vs Casio EX-FC150, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Casio. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and EX-FC150 (10MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and EX-FC150 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe M200 was unveiled 10 years after the EX-FC150 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Casio EX-FC150 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the M200 matches up versus the EX-FC150 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon M200 vs Casio EX-FC150 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS M200 & Casio Exilim EX-FC150. The full galleries are available at Canon M200 Gallery & Casio EX-FC150 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Casio EX-FC150
| M200 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2019 |  | November 2009 | Newer by 120 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FC150 over the Canon M200
| EX-FC150 | M200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Casio EX-FC150
| M200 | EX-FC150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus |
Canon M200 vs Casio EX-FC150 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and size. The Canon M200 comes with physical dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Casio EX-FC150 has specifications of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 173 grams (0.38 lbs).
Check out the Canon M200 vs Casio EX-FC150 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the M200 vs the EX-FC150.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the M200 and EX-FC150 is 88 and 93 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Casio EX-FC150 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by viewing technical specs. The image underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the M200 and EX-FC150.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The M200 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Canon M200 will render extra detail having an extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent M200 should have an edge in sensor tech.
Canon M200 vs Casio EX-FC150 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon M200 vs Casio EX-FC150 Specifications
| Canon EOS M200 | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon EOS M200 | Casio Exilim EX-FC150 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2019-09-25 | 2009-11-16 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 8 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 37-185mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.6-4.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Number of lenses | 23 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 6.1 frames/s | 40.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 2.60 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 299 gr (0.66 lbs) | 173 gr (0.38 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LP-E12 | NP-40 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $549 | $350 |
