Clicky

Canon M200 vs Kodak M380

Portability
88
Imaging
70
Features
80
Overall
74
Canon EOS M200 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M380 front
Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
13
Overall
25

Canon M200 vs Kodak M380 Key Specs

Canon M200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
  • Announced September 2019
  • Replaced the Canon M100
Kodak M380
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-190mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon M200 vs Kodak M380 Overview

Below, we will be analyzing the Canon M200 and Kodak M380, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Kodak. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and M380 (10MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and M380 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.

Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

The M200 was introduced 10 years later than the M380 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Kodak M380 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the M200 scores vs the M380 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Kodak M380

 M200 M380 
RevealedSeptember 2019January 2009More recent by 131 months
Manual focus More exact focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k230kClearer screen (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Kodak M380 over the Canon M200

 M380 M200 

Common features in the Canon M200 and Kodak M380

 M200 M380 
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing

Canon M200 vs Kodak M380 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon M200 has got exterior dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Kodak M380 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Contrast the Canon M200 and Kodak M380 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the M200 and the M380.

Canon M200 vs Kodak M380 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and M380 is 88 and 95 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Kodak M380 top view buttons comparison

Canon M200 vs Kodak M380 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor measurements just by researching a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M200 and M380.

As you can see, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M200 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Canon M200 will render extra detail using its extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more modern M200 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Canon M200 vs Kodak M380 sensor size comparison

Canon M200 vs Kodak M380 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M200 vs Kodak M380 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon M200 Portrait photography highlights
Kodak M380 Portrait photography highlights
75
you can focus manually
decent MP (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
external flash not possible
19
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon M200
Street photography with Kodak M380
82
tilting screen
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
offers focus by touch
good high ISO (25,600)
no image stabilization
47
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than average (155 grams)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Canon M200 Sports photography info
Kodak M380 Sports photography info
75
decent MP (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
provides tracking autofocus
sensor has phase detect auto focus
no image stabilization
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,448s)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

Travel Comparison

Canon M200 Travel photography information
Kodak M380 Travel photography information
89
has bluetooth
offers focus by touch
decent MP (24MP)
has built in flash
display is selfie friendly
50
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (155g)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Canon M200 Landscape photography information
Kodak M380 Landscape photography information
80
you can focus manually
change lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
decent MP (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
no image stabilization
27
decent sized screen (3 inches)
focusing manually not possible
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 Vlogging highlights
Kodak M380 Vlogging highlights
75
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
provides face detection focus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
no image stabilization
lack of external mic jack
22
wide angle not the best (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external mic port
heavier than average (155g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon M200 vs Kodak M380 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M200 and Kodak M380
 Canon EOS M200Kodak EasyShare M380
General Information
Company Canon Kodak
Model type Canon EOS M200 Kodak EasyShare M380
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Ultracompact
Announced 2019-09-25 2009-01-08
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by DIGIC 8 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 22.3 x 14.9mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 332.3mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 6000 x 4000 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 25600 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 143 25
Lens
Lens support Canon EF-M fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 38-190mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.1-5.6
Macro focusing range - 10cm
Number of lenses 23 -
Focal length multiplier 1.6 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1448s
Continuous shooting speed 6.1 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.00 m (at ISO 100) 2.50 m
Flash modes - Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 299 grams (0.66 lb) 155 grams (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 315 photos -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID LP-E12 KLIC-7003
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $549 $160