Clicky

Canon M200 vs Kodak Z915

Portability
88
Imaging
70
Features
80
Overall
74
Canon EOS M200 front
 
Kodak EasyShare Z915 front
Portability
91
Imaging
33
Features
18
Overall
27

Canon M200 vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs

Canon M200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
  • Launched September 2019
  • Earlier Model is Canon M100
Kodak Z915
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon M200 vs Kodak Z915 Overview

The following is a in-depth review of the Canon M200 versus Kodak Z915, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Kodak. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and Z915 (10MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and Z915 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The M200 was manufactured 10 years after the Z915 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Kodak Z915 being a Compact camera.

Before diving into a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the M200 grades vs the Z915 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Kodak Z915

 M200 Z915 
RevealedSeptember 2019January 2009Newer by 131 months
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1040k230kSharper screen (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Canon M200

 Z915 M200 

Common features in the Canon M200 and Kodak Z915

 M200 Z915 

Canon M200 vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Canon M200 enjoys exterior measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Kodak Z915 has specifications of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Examine the Canon M200 versus Kodak Z915 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the M200 versus the Z915.

Canon M200 vs Kodak Z915 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M200 and Z915 is 88 and 91 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Kodak Z915 top view buttons comparison

Canon M200 vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by going over a spec sheet. The pic underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the M200 and Z915.

Clearly, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M200 because of its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Canon M200 will deliver extra detail due to its extra 14MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent M200 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Canon M200 vs Kodak Z915 sensor size comparison

Canon M200 vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M200 vs Kodak Z915 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon M200
Portrait photography with Kodak Z915
75
manual focus
good MP (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
has face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
external flash not possible
19
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Canon M200 as a Street photography camera
Kodak Z915 as a Street photography camera
82
tilting screen
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
provides focus by touch
good high ISO (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
54
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Canon M200 Sports photography advice
Kodak Z915 Sports photography advice
75
good MP (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
has tracking autofocus
comes with phase detect AF
lack of image stabilization
24
has image stabilization (Optical)
low max shutter speed (1/1,250 seconds)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Canon M200 Travel photography details
Kodak Z915 Travel photography details
89
supports bluetooth
provides focus by touch
good MP (24MP)
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
54
built-in flash
very long reach (350mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution low (10MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Canon M200 Landscape photography information
Kodak Z915 Landscape photography information
80
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
nice screen size (3")
good MP (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
27
has image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 Vlogging information
Kodak Z915 Vlogging information
75
selfie friendly display
touchscreen
has face detection focusing
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
lack of image stabilization
no external microphone jack
24
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have mic jack
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Canon M200 vs Kodak Z915 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M200 and Kodak Z915
 Canon EOS M200Kodak EasyShare Z915
General Information
Brand Name Canon Kodak
Model type Canon EOS M200 Kodak EasyShare Z915
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2019-09-25 2009-01-08
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 8 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 22.3 x 14.9mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 332.3mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 6000 x 4000 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 25600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 143 25
Lens
Lens mount type Canon EF-M fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 35-350mm (10.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-4.8
Macro focusing distance - 10cm
Available lenses 23 -
Focal length multiplier 1.6 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 2.5 inch
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30s 16s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1250s
Continuous shooting speed 6.1 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.80 m
Flash settings - Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 299 grams (0.66 pounds) 194 grams (0.43 pounds)
Physical dimensions 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 315 images -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID LP-E12 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $549 $200