Canon M200 vs Kodak Z915
88 Imaging
70 Features
80 Overall
74
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Canon M200 vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Launched September 2019
- Earlier Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Revealed January 2009
Canon M200 vs Kodak Z915 Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Canon M200 versus Kodak Z915, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Kodak. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and Z915 (10MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and Z915 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M200 was manufactured 10 years after the Z915 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Kodak Z915 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the M200 grades vs the Z915 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon M200 vs Kodak Z915 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS M200 & Kodak EasyShare Z915. The entire galleries are provided at Canon M200 Gallery & Kodak Z915 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Kodak Z915
M200 | Z915 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2019 | January 2009 | Newer by 131 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Canon M200
Z915 | M200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Kodak Z915
M200 | Z915 |
---|
Canon M200 vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Canon M200 enjoys exterior measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Kodak Z915 has specifications of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Canon M200 versus Kodak Z915 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the M200 versus the Z915.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M200 and Z915 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by going over a spec sheet. The pic underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the M200 and Z915.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M200 because of its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Canon M200 will deliver extra detail due to its extra 14MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent M200 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon M200 vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon M200 vs Kodak Z915 Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Kodak |
Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2019-09-25 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 8 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Available lenses | 23 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1250s |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.1 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.80 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 299 grams (0.66 pounds) | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LP-E12 | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $549 | $200 |