Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
88 Imaging
70 Features
80 Overall
74
65 Imaging
46 Features
56 Overall
50
Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Launched September 2019
- Superseded the Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Revealed January 2014
Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the M200 (24MP) and the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) is relatively similar but the M200 (APS-C) and Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M200 was revealed 5 years later than the Astro Zoom AZ651 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the M200 matches up against the Astro Zoom AZ651 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS M200 & Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651. The full galleries are viewable at Canon M200 Gallery & Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
M200 | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2019 | January 2014 | More recent by 70 months | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Clearer screen (+120k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Canon M200
Astro Zoom AZ651 | M200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Common features in the Canon M200 and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
M200 | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly |
Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Canon M200 provides external measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has sizing of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
Check the Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the M200 against the Astro Zoom AZ651.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and Astro Zoom AZ651 is 88 and 65 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to picture the contrast between sensor measurements only by reviewing specs. The visual below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the M200 and Astro Zoom AZ651.
As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M200 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Canon M200 will offer you greater detail because of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher M200 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Kodak |
Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2019-09-25 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 8 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 21MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-1560mm (65.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 23 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.1 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 299g (0.66 pounds) | 567g (1.25 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LP-E12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $549 | $419 |