Clicky

Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

Portability
88
Imaging
70
Features
80
Overall
74
Canon EOS M200 front
 
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
Portability
65
Imaging
46
Features
56
Overall
50

Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Key Specs

Canon M200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
  • Launched September 2019
  • Superseded the Canon M100
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Overview

Below is a extensive review of the Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the M200 (24MP) and the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) is relatively similar but the M200 (APS-C) and Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The M200 was revealed 5 years later than the Astro Zoom AZ651 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the M200 matches up against the Astro Zoom AZ651 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 M200 Astro Zoom AZ651 
RevealedSeptember 2019January 2014More recent by 70 months
Screen resolution1040k920kClearer screen (+120k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Canon M200

 Astro Zoom AZ651 M200 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen

Common features in the Canon M200 and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 M200 Astro Zoom AZ651 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen size
Selfie screen Both are selfie friendly

Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Canon M200 provides external measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has sizing of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).

Check the Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the M200 against the Astro Zoom AZ651.

Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and Astro Zoom AZ651 is 88 and 65 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 top view buttons comparison

Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its hard to picture the contrast between sensor measurements only by reviewing specs. The visual below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the M200 and Astro Zoom AZ651.

As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M200 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Canon M200 will offer you greater detail because of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher M200 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 sensor size comparison

Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon M200 Portrait photography features
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Portrait photography features
75
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
offers face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
cannot use external flash
54
focusing manually
good megapixels (21 megapixels)
includes face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon M200
Street photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
82
tilting screen
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
supports focus by touch
good ISO range (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
59
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (567g)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Canon M200 as a Sports photography camera
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Sports photography camera
75
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
offers tracking focus
supports phase detect autofocus
does not have image stabilization
51
incredible zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (21MP)
includes tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon M200
Travel photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
89
connects via bluetooth
supports focus by touch
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
60
good megapixels (21 megapixels)
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
relatively wide (24mm)
long reach (1560mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (567 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Canon M200 as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Landscape photography camera
80
focusing manually
swap lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
does not have image stabilization
54
focusing manually
relatively wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (21MP)
saves RAW formats
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 Vlogging advice
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Vlogging advice
75
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
offers face detect autofocus
high video quality (3840 x 2160 resolution)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have mic jack
60
relatively wide (24mm)
display is selfie friendly
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than competition (567g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon M200 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M200 and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
 Canon EOS M200Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Kodak
Model type Canon EOS M200 Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2019-09-25 2014-01-07
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip DIGIC 8 -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 22.3 x 14.9mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 332.3mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 21MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 6000 x 4000 5184 x 3888
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 143 25
Lens
Lens support Canon EF-M fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-1560mm (65.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.9-6.5
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Amount of lenses 23 -
Focal length multiplier 1.6 5.8
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fully Articulated
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 1,040k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs -
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 6.1 frames/s 9.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.00 m (at ISO 100) -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 299g (0.66 pounds) 567g (1.25 pounds)
Dimensions 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 315 pictures -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID LP-E12 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) -
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) -
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $549 $419