Canon M200 vs Nikon S6900
88 Imaging
70 Features
80 Overall
74
93 Imaging
41 Features
43 Overall
41
Canon M200 vs Nikon S6900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Revealed September 2019
- Replaced the Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 181g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2015
Canon M200 vs Nikon S6900 Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Canon M200 versus Nikon S6900, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Canon and Nikon. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and S6900 (16MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and S6900 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To CamerasThe M200 was brought out 4 years later than the S6900 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Nikon S6900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the M200 scores against the S6900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon M200 vs Nikon S6900 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon EOS M200 & Nikon Coolpix S6900. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon M200 Gallery & Nikon S6900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Nikon S6900
M200 | S6900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2019 | February 2015 | More recent by 57 months | |
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Nikon S6900 over the Canon M200
S6900 | M200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Common features in the Canon M200 and Nikon S6900
M200 | S6900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies |
Canon M200 vs Nikon S6900 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Canon M200 has external dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Nikon S6900 has specifications of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs).
Contrast the Canon M200 versus Nikon S6900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the M200 versus the S6900.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M200 and S6900 is 88 and 93 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Nikon S6900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to see the difference in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The visual underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M200 and S6900.
Plainly, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M200 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Canon M200 will render more detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger M200 will have an edge in sensor technology.
Canon M200 vs Nikon S6900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon M200 vs Nikon S6900 Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Nikon Coolpix S6900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Nikon |
Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Nikon Coolpix S6900 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2019-09-25 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 8 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
Amount of lenses | 23 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.1fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 2.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 299 grams (0.66 lb) | 181 grams (0.40 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 images | 180 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LP-E12 | EN-EL19 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $549 | $190 |