Canon M200 vs Olympus FE-4030
88 Imaging
70 Features
80 Overall
74
95 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Canon M200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Announced September 2019
- Succeeded the Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Launched January 2010
Canon M200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Overview
Below is a complete review of the Canon M200 versus Olympus FE-4030, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and FE-4030 (14MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and FE-4030 (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe M200 was introduced 9 years later than the FE-4030 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus FE-4030 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the M200 grades against the FE-4030 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon M200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon EOS M200 and Olympus FE-4030. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon M200 Gallery and Olympus FE-4030 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Olympus FE-4030
M200 | FE-4030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2019 | January 2010 | More recent by 119 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Canon M200
FE-4030 | M200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Olympus FE-4030
M200 | FE-4030 |
---|
Canon M200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon M200 provides exterior measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-4030 has measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs).
Analyze the Canon M200 versus Olympus FE-4030 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the M200 versus the FE-4030.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and FE-4030 is 88 and 95 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements only by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the M200 and FE-4030.
Clearly, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M200 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Canon M200 will show greater detail using its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The fresher M200 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon M200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon M200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Olympus FE-4030 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon EOS M200 | Olympus FE-4030 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2019-09-25 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 8 | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.6-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 4cm |
Amount of lenses | 23 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.1 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.80 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 299 gr (0.66 lbs) | 146 gr (0.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LP-E12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $549 | $130 |