Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
88 Imaging
70 Features
80 Overall
74
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Launched September 2019
- Replaced the Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Announced February 2012
Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Canon M200 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (APS-C).
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or MThe M200 was released 7 years after the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summation of how the M200 matches up vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS M200 & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon M200 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
M200 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2019 | February 2012 | More modern by 94 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Clearer screen (+120k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Canon M200
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | M200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
M200 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon M200 has got outer measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") having a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check the Canon M200 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the M200 versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 88 and 69 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through specifications. The picture here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the M200 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
To sum up, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Canon M200 to give you greater detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The fresher M200 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Ricoh |
Model | Canon EOS M200 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2019-09-25 | 2012-02-02 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 8 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Amount of lenses | 23 | - |
Crop factor | 1.6 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 180s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.1fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 299g (0.66 pounds) | 550g (1.21 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 images | 400 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LP-E12 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $549 | $871 |