Canon M200 vs Samsung WB35F
88 Imaging
70 Features
80 Overall
74
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Canon M200 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Announced September 2019
- Earlier Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
Canon M200 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Lets look more closely at the Canon M200 versus Samsung WB35F, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Canon and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and WB35F (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe M200 was brought out 5 years after the WB35F which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick overview of how the M200 scores vs the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon M200 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon EOS M200 & Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon M200 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Samsung WB35F
M200 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2019 | January 2014 | Newer by 70 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Canon M200
WB35F | M200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Samsung WB35F
M200 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing |
Canon M200 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon M200 features outside measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Canon M200 versus Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the M200 compared to the WB35F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M200 and WB35F is 88 and 93 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over specs. The pic below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the M200 and WB35F.
All in all, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M200 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Canon M200 will deliver more detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images more aggressively. The more modern M200 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Canon M200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon M200 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Samsung |
Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Samsung WB35F |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2019-09-25 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 8 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 143 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.1-6.3 |
Available lenses | 23 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.1fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 299 gr (0.66 pounds) | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LP-E12 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $549 | $130 |