Clicky

Canon M200 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
88
Imaging
70
Features
80
Overall
74
Canon EOS M200 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Canon M200 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Canon M200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
  • Announced September 2019
  • Earlier Model is Canon M100
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon M200 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Lets look more closely at the Canon M200 versus Samsung WB35F, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Canon and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and WB35F (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The M200 was brought out 5 years after the WB35F which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick overview of how the M200 scores vs the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Samsung WB35F

 M200 WB35F 
IntroducedSeptember 2019January 2014Newer by 70 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k230kCrisper display (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Canon M200

 WB35F M200 

Common features in the Canon M200 and Samsung WB35F

 M200 WB35F 
Focus manually Very precise focusing

Canon M200 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon M200 features outside measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

See the Canon M200 versus Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the M200 compared to the WB35F.

Canon M200 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M200 and WB35F is 88 and 93 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Canon M200 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over specs. The pic below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the M200 and WB35F.

All in all, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M200 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Canon M200 will deliver more detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images more aggressively. The more modern M200 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Canon M200 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Canon M200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon M200 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Portrait photography camera
75
manual focus
MP count decent (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
includes face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
cannot use external flash
37
focusing manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Canon M200 Street photography features
Samsung WB35F Street photography features
82
tilting screen
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
includes focus by touch
good high ISO (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (194 grams)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Canon M200 Sports photography factors
Samsung WB35F Sports photography factors
75
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
includes tracking autofocus
has phase detect AF
does not have image stabilization
40
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Canon M200 Travel photography details
Samsung WB35F Travel photography details
89
supports bluetooth
includes focus by touch
MP count decent (24MP)
flash built-in
selfie friendly display
70
lighter than competitors (194g)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
long reach (288mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon M200
Landscape photography with Samsung WB35F
80
manual focus
swap lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
nice screen size (3")
MP count decent (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
does not have image stabilization
43
focusing manually
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 Vlogging advice
Samsung WB35F Vlogging advice
75
selfie friendly display
touch screen
includes face detection focusing
high res video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
does not have image stabilization
lack of external microphone jack
31
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (194 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Canon M200 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M200 and Samsung WB35F
 Canon EOS M200Samsung WB35F
General Information
Make Canon Samsung
Model type Canon EOS M200 Samsung WB35F
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2019-09-25 2014-01-07
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 8 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 22.3 x 14.9mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 332.3mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 6000 x 4000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 143 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Canon EF-M fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-288mm (12.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.1-6.3
Available lenses 23 -
Focal length multiplier 1.6 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 6.1fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 299 gr (0.66 pounds) 194 gr (0.43 pounds)
Physical dimensions 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 315 pictures -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID LP-E12 BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $549 $130