Canon M5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
77 Imaging
67 Features
84 Overall
73
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Canon M5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 427g - 116 x 89 x 61mm
- Announced September 2016
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Released March 2010
Canon M5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Canon M5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the M5 (24MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the M5 (APS-C) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") posses different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M5 was unveiled 6 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Canon M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the M5 matches up against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Canon M5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS M5 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The full galleries are viewable at Canon M5 Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M5 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
M5 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | March 2010 | More modern by 80 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 920k | Clearer screen (+700k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Canon M5
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | M5 |
---|
Common features in the Canon M5 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
M5 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus |
Canon M5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon M5 provides external dimensions of 116mm x 89mm x 61mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.4") along with a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
See the Canon M5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the M5 versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M5 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 77 and 85 respectively.
Canon M5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The pic here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the M5 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M5 having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Canon M5 will give greater detail having an extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The newer M5 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Canon M5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon M5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Canon EOS M5 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Ricoh |
Model | Canon EOS M5 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-09-15 | 2010-03-18 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 7 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 23 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,620k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 180 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 9.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/200 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MP4, H.264, AAC | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 427g (0.94 lb) | 355g (0.78 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 89 x 61mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.4") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 77 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1262 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 295 photos | 410 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $680 | $349 |