Canon M50 II vs Kodak Easyshare M5370
79 Imaging
70 Features
88 Overall
77
95 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
Canon M50 II vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 387g - 116 x 88 x 59mm
- Announced October 2020
- Succeeded the Canon M50
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Released September 2011
Canon M50 II vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Canon M50 II vs Kodak Easyshare M5370, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Kodak. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the M50 II (24MP) and Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and the M50 II (APS-C) and Easyshare M5370 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe M50 II was announced 9 years after the Easyshare M5370 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Canon M50 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Kodak Easyshare M5370 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the M50 II grades vs the Easyshare M5370 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon M50 II vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS M50 Mark II & Kodak Easyshare M5370. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon M50 II Gallery & Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M50 II over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
M50 II | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2020 | September 2011 | Newer by 111 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Canon M50 II
Easyshare M5370 | M50 II |
---|
Common features in the Canon M50 II and Kodak Easyshare M5370
M50 II | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Canon M50 II vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Canon M50 II has got outside measurements of 116mm x 88mm x 59mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.3") and a weight of 387 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check out the Canon M50 II vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the M50 II and the Easyshare M5370.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M50 II and Easyshare M5370 is 79 and 95 respectively.
Canon M50 II vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specs. The picture underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the M50 II and Easyshare M5370.
As you can plainly see, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M50 II with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Canon M50 II will result in greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The fresher M50 II is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon M50 II vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon M50 II vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications
Canon EOS M50 Mark II | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Kodak |
Model | Canon EOS M50 Mark II | Kodak Easyshare M5370 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2020-10-14 | 2011-09-14 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 23 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.20 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-1, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 387 gr (0.85 lbs) | 150 gr (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 116 x 88 x 59mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.3") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 305 photos | - |
Battery form | Built-in | - |
Battery model | - | KLIC-7006 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I compatible) | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $599 | $160 |