Clicky

Canon M50 II vs Ricoh CX4

Portability
79
Imaging
70
Features
88
Overall
77
Canon EOS M50 Mark II front
 
Ricoh CX4 front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
34
Overall
34

Canon M50 II vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs

Canon M50 II
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 387g - 116 x 88 x 59mm
  • Launched October 2020
  • Succeeded the Canon M50
Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Introduced August 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon M50 II vs Ricoh CX4 Overview

Its time to look a little more in depth at the Canon M50 II versus Ricoh CX4, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the M50 II (24MP) and CX4 (10MP) and the M50 II (APS-C) and CX4 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The M50 II was launched 10 years after the CX4 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Canon M50 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the M50 II grades versus the CX4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon M50 II over the Ricoh CX4

 M50 II CX4 
IntroducedOctober 2020August 2010More modern by 124 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1040k920kClearer display (+120k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Canon M50 II

 CX4 M50 II 

Common features in the Canon M50 II and Ricoh CX4

 M50 II CX4 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Display size3"3"Same display sizing

Canon M50 II vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon M50 II enjoys external dimensions of 116mm x 88mm x 59mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.3") and a weight of 387 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has sizing of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).

Check the Canon M50 II versus Ricoh CX4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the M50 II compared to the CX4.

Canon M50 II vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the M50 II and CX4 is 79 and 92 respectively.

Canon M50 II vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison

Canon M50 II vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes purely by seeing a spec sheet. The pic below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M50 II and CX4.

Clearly, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M50 II featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Canon M50 II will provide extra detail utilizing its extra 14MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The younger M50 II should have an edge in sensor technology.

Canon M50 II vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison

Canon M50 II vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M50 II vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon M50 II Portrait photography factors
Ricoh CX4 Portrait photography factors
82
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
includes face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
27
has manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Canon M50 II Street photography info
Ricoh CX4 Street photography info
84
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
has touch focus
great high ISO (25,600)
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (205 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Canon M50 II as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Sports photography camera
76
has image stabilization
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
includes tracking focus
has phase detect autofocus
bad battery life (305 CIPA)
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Canon M50 II Travel photography features
Ricoh CX4 Travel photography features
78
supports bluetooth
has touch focus
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
bad battery life (305 CIPA)
66
lighter than average (205g)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
long zoom (300mm)
low MP (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon M50 II
Landscape photography with Ricoh CX4
80
has manual focus
swap lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
great high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
bad battery life (305 per charge)
42
has manual focus
really wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M50 II as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Vlogging camera
85
screen is selfie friendly
has touchscreen
has image stabilization
includes face detect autofocus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
has microphone support
30
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (205 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon M50 II vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M50 II and Ricoh CX4
 Canon EOS M50 Mark IIRicoh CX4
General Information
Brand Canon Ricoh
Model Canon EOS M50 Mark II Ricoh CX4
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2020-10-14 2010-08-19
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 22.3 x 14.9mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 332.3mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Max resolution 6000 x 4000 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Max enhanced ISO 51200 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 143 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Canon EF-M fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-300mm (10.7x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-5.6
Macro focus range - 1cm
Total lenses 23 -
Crop factor 1.6 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 10.0 frames per sec 5.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.00 m
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Yes None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 387 gr (0.85 pounds) 205 gr (0.45 pounds)
Physical dimensions 116 x 88 x 59mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.3") 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 305 pictures -
Form of battery Built-in -
Battery model - DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I compatible) SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $599 $211