Canon RP vs Kodak M320
70 Imaging
76 Features
80 Overall
77
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Canon RP vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 40000 (Boost to 102400)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 485g - 133 x 85 x 70mm
- Launched February 2019
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched January 2009
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Canon RP vs Kodak M320 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Canon RP and Kodak M320, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Canon and Kodak. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the RP (26MP) and M320 (9MP) and the RP (Full frame) and M320 (1/2.5") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe RP was released 10 years after the M320 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Canon RP being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the RP matches up against the M320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon RP vs Kodak M320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon EOS RP & Kodak EasyShare M320. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon RP Gallery & Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon RP over the Kodak M320
| RP | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2019 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 123 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Canon RP
| M320 | RP |
|---|
Common features in the Canon RP and Kodak M320
| RP | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Canon RP vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon RP provides outside dimensions of 133mm x 85mm x 70mm (5.2" x 3.3" x 2.8") and a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs) while the Kodak M320 has dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Canon RP and Kodak M320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the RP and the M320.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the RP and M320 is 70 and 95 respectively.
Canon RP vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes purely by looking through specs. The picture underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the RP and M320.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The RP featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Canon RP will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 17 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The fresher RP is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Canon RP vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon RP vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| Canon EOS RP | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Kodak |
| Model type | Canon EOS RP | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2019-02-14 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 8 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 35.9 x 24mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 861.6mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 26 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Max native ISO | 40000 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 102400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 50 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 4779 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Canon RF | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Available lenses | 17 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 485 grams (1.07 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 133 x 85 x 70mm (5.2" x 3.3" x 2.8") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 85 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 24.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.9 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 2977 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $999 | $39 |
