Clicky

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony A300

Portability
96
Imaging
46
Features
26
Overall
38
Canon IXUS 165 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Canon IXUS 165
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
  • 128g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2015
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Announced January 2008
  • New Model is Sony A330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony A300 Overview

Its time to look a bit more closely at the Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony A300, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Canon and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the IXUS 165 (20MP) and A300 (10MP) and the IXUS 165 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The IXUS 165 was manufactured 7 years later than the A300 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Canon IXUS 165 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the IXUS 165 grades versus the A300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon IXUS 165 over the Sony A300

 IXUS 165 A300 
AnnouncedJanuary 2015January 2008More recent by 85 months

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Canon IXUS 165

 A300 IXUS 165 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Canon IXUS 165 and Sony A300

 IXUS 165 A300 
Screen dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal screen dimensions
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Canon IXUS 165 enjoys exterior measurements of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") and a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sony A300 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

See the Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony A300 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the IXUS 165 vs the A300.

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony A300 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the IXUS 165 and A300 is 96 and 64 respectively.

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over specifications. The photograph below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the IXUS 165 and A300.

Plainly, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The IXUS 165 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Canon IXUS 165 will deliver greater detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots more aggressively. The more recent IXUS 165 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon IXUS 165 Portrait photography advice
Sony A300 Portrait photography advice
39
megapixel count decent (20MP)
includes face detect focusing
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
59
focusing manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
low MP (10MP)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon IXUS 165
Street photography with Sony A300
59
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
74
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Canon IXUS 165 Sports photography details
Sony A300 Sports photography details
44
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (0.8 frames per second)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
54
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with phase detect auto focus
max fps low (3.0 fps)
low MP (10MP)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Canon IXUS 165 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A300 as a Travel photography camera
67
megapixel count decent (20MP)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
45
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse function
low MP (10 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon IXUS 165
Landscape photography with Sony A300
41
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7")
manual exposure not available
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
57
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (2.7")
low MP (10MP)
does not have Timelapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon IXUS 165
Vlogging with Sony A300
32
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focusing
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic socket
9
can't shoot video
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon IXUS 165 and Sony A300
 Canon IXUS 165Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Sony
Model Canon IXUS 165 Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Category Ultracompact Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2015-01-06 2008-01-30
Physical type Ultracompact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip DIGIC 4+ -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 5152 x 3864 3872 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 28-224mm (8.0x) -
Largest aperture f/3.2-6.9 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Total lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 2.7" 2.7"
Display resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 0.8 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, on, off, slow synchro Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 128g (0.28 lb) 632g (1.39 lb)
Physical dimensions 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 64
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.4
DXO Low light score not tested 538
Other
Battery life 220 pictures -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-11L/LH -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card Compact Flash
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $0 $0