Canon A2300 vs Olympus E-PL3
96 Imaging
39 Features
25 Overall
33
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
Canon A2300 vs Olympus E-PL3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 125g - 95 x 54 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Launched September 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL2
Canon A2300 vs Olympus E-PL3 Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Canon A2300 vs Olympus E-PL3, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Canon and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the A2300 (16MP) and E-PL3 (12MP) and the A2300 (1/2.3") and E-PL3 (Four Thirds) feature different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe A2300 was launched 5 months later than the E-PL3 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Canon A2300 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short overview of how the A2300 scores versus the E-PL3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Canon A2300 vs Olympus E-PL3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A2300 & Olympus PEN E-PL3. The complete galleries are provided at Canon A2300 Gallery & Olympus E-PL3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2300 over the Olympus E-PL3
A2300 | E-PL3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Canon A2300
E-PL3 | A2300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A2300 and Olympus E-PL3
A2300 | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | September 2011 | Similar age | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Canon A2300 vs Olympus E-PL3 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Canon A2300 has external measurements of 95mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL3 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs).
Check the Canon A2300 vs Olympus E-PL3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the A2300 vs the E-PL3.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the A2300 and E-PL3 is 96 and 88 respectively.
Canon A2300 vs Olympus E-PL3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading a spec sheet. The photograph here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the A2300 and E-PL3.
As you can see, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The A2300 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Canon A2300 will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively.
Canon A2300 vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon A2300 vs Olympus E-PL3 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A2300 | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot A2300 | Olympus PEN E-PL3 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2011-09-20 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Truepic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 313g (0.69 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 54 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 52 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 499 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 images | 300 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-11L | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $139 | $399 |