Clicky

Canon A3400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
35
Overall
37
Canon PowerShot A3400 IS front
 
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
Portability
65
Imaging
46
Features
56
Overall
50

Canon A3400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Key Specs

Canon A3400 IS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
  • 126g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
  • Released February 2012
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Released January 2014
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Canon A3400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Overview

Below, we are looking at the Canon A3400 IS versus Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Kodak. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the A3400 IS (16MP) and Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

The A3400 IS was launched 23 months prior to the Astro Zoom AZ651 making the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Canon A3400 IS being a Compact camera and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the A3400 IS scores against the Astro Zoom AZ651 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon A3400 IS over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 A3400 IS Astro Zoom AZ651 
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Canon A3400 IS

 Astro Zoom AZ651 A3400 IS 
ReleasedJanuary 2014February 2012Newer by 23 months
Manually focus More precise focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Canon A3400 IS and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 A3400 IS Astro Zoom AZ651 
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing

Canon A3400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon A3400 IS features outside measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has proportions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") having a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).

Contrast the Canon A3400 IS versus Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the A3400 IS and the Astro Zoom AZ651.

Canon A3400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A3400 IS and Astro Zoom AZ651 is 96 and 65 respectively.

Canon A3400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 top view buttons comparison

Canon A3400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions simply by seeing specifications. The image underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the A3400 IS and Astro Zoom AZ651.

To sum up, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to show extra detail utilizing its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged A3400 IS will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Canon A3400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 sensor size comparison

Canon A3400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A3400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon A3400 IS
Portrait photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
34
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
supports face detect focusing
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
54
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (21 megapixels)
comes with face detect focus
supports RAW formats
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Street Comparison

Canon A3400 IS Street photography information
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Street photography information
67
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has focus via touch
lighter than competitors in class (126g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
59
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
small sensor size (1/2.3")
more heavy than average (567 grams)
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Sports Comparison

Canon A3400 IS Sports photography highlights
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sports photography highlights
38
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (180 shots)
lacks phase detect AF
51
great zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (21 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Travel Comparison

Canon A3400 IS Travel photography features
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Travel photography features
68
lighter than competitors in class (126g)
has focus via touch
megapixel count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
terrible battery pack (180 per charge)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
60
decent sensor resolution (21 megapixels)
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
really wide (24mm)
long reach (1560mm)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than average (567 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon A3400 IS
Landscape photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
41
pretty wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
terrible battery pack (180 per charge)
missing Time Lapse mode
54
manual focus
really wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (21MP)
supports RAW formats
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of Timelapse function
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A3400 IS Vlogging features
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Vlogging features
34
pretty wide (28mm)
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focusing
lighter than competitors in class (126 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic jack
60
really wide (24mm)
screen is selfie friendly
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
lack of microphone jack
more heavy than average (567 grams)
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Canon A3400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A3400 IS and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
 Canon PowerShot A3400 ISKodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651
General Information
Brand Canon Kodak
Model type Canon PowerShot A3400 IS Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2012-02-07 2014-01-07
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 21MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-1560mm (65.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-6.9 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focusing distance 3cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Features
Min shutter speed 15s -
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames/s 9.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 126 gr (0.28 lbs) 567 gr (1.25 lbs)
Dimensions 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 180 photos -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-11L -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $230 $419