Canon A495 vs Casio EX-100
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed February 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon A495 vs Casio EX-100 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Canon A495 and Casio EX-100, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Casio. The sensor resolution of the A495 (10MP) and the EX-100 (12MP) is very similar but the A495 (1/2.3") and EX-100 (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe A495 was manufactured 5 years prior to the EX-100 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the A495 matches up vs the EX-100 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon A495 vs Casio EX-100 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot A495 and Casio Exilim EX-100. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon A495 Gallery and Casio EX-100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Casio EX-100
| A495 | EX-100 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Canon A495
| EX-100 | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | January 2010 | Fresher by 49 months | |
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display size | 3.5" | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 115k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Casio EX-100
| A495 | EX-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-100 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon A495 has outside dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-100 has measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") along with a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs).
See the Canon A495 and Casio EX-100 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the A495 against the EX-100.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the A495 and EX-100 is 93 and 83 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-100 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to see the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph here should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A495 and EX-100.
Clearly, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The A495 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh tougher and the Casio EX-100 will offer you more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older A495 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-100 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon A495 vs Casio EX-100 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Casio Exilim EX-100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A495 | Casio Exilim EX-100 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-01-05 | 2014-02-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 115k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | Super Clear LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/20000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 30.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 6.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 pounds) | 389 grams (0.86 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 390 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $109 | $572 |