Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
61 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2013
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200 Overview
The following is a in-depth analysis of the Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Canon and FujiFilm. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and Fujifilm S8200 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe A495 was revealed 4 years before the Fujifilm S8200 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Canon A495 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S8200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the A495 grades against the Fujifilm S8200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A495 & Fujifilm FinePix S8200. The full galleries are viewable at Canon A495 Gallery & Fujifilm S8200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Fujifilm S8200
A495 | Fujifilm S8200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8200 over the Canon A495
Fujifilm S8200 | A495 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | January 2010 | Newer by 36 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 115k | Sharper display (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Fujifilm S8200
A495 | Fujifilm S8200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon A495 comes with physical dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm S8200 has proportions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the A495 vs the Fujifilm S8200.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A495 and Fujifilm S8200 is 93 and 61 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking technical specs. The picture here will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A495 and Fujifilm S8200.
As you can tell, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Fujifilm S8200 to give greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged A495 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A495 | Fujifilm FinePix S8200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model | Canon PowerShot A495 | Fujifilm FinePix S8200 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-01-05 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 24-960mm (40.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 0cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 115 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dot |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1700 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 175 grams (0.39 lbs) | 670 grams (1.48 lbs) |
Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 2 x AA | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $109 | $450 |