Clicky

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A495 front
 
Fujifilm FinePix S8200 front
Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
42
Overall
40

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200 Key Specs

Canon A495
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Announced January 2010
Fujifilm S8200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-960mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Released January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200 Overview

The following is a in-depth analysis of the Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Canon and FujiFilm. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and Fujifilm S8200 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The A495 was revealed 4 years before the Fujifilm S8200 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Canon A495 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S8200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the A495 grades against the Fujifilm S8200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Fujifilm S8200

 A495 Fujifilm S8200 

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8200 over the Canon A495

 Fujifilm S8200 A495 
ReleasedJanuary 2013January 2010Newer by 36 months
Manual focus More exact focus
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k115kSharper display (+345k dot)

Common features in the Canon A495 and Fujifilm S8200

 A495 Fujifilm S8200 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon A495 comes with physical dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm S8200 has proportions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the A495 vs the Fujifilm S8200.

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A495 and Fujifilm S8200 is 93 and 61 respectively.

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200 top view buttons comparison

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking technical specs. The picture here will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A495 and Fujifilm S8200.

As you can tell, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Fujifilm S8200 to give greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged A495 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200 sensor size comparison

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A495 as a Portrait photography camera
Fujifilm S8200 as a Portrait photography camera
19
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
low MP (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
40
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Canon A495 Street photography info
Fujifilm S8200 Street photography info
46
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
41
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Canon A495 as a Sports photography camera
Fujifilm S8200 as a Sports photography camera
16
slow frames per second (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
50
great zoom range (24-960mm 40.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Canon A495 Travel photography info
Fujifilm S8200 Travel photography info
50
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
low MP (10MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
52
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
long zoom (960mm)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Canon A495 Landscape photography factors
Fujifilm S8200 Landscape photography factors
22
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen is small (2.5 inches)
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
47
manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A495 Vlogging info
Fujifilm S8200 Vlogging info
21
wide angle not great (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone support
24
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon A495 vs Fujifilm S8200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A495 and Fujifilm S8200
 Canon PowerShot A495Fujifilm FinePix S8200
General Information
Brand Name Canon FujiFilm
Model Canon PowerShot A495 Fujifilm FinePix S8200
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2010-01-05 2013-01-07
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Min native ISO 80 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 37-122mm (3.3x) 24-960mm (40.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focus distance 1cm 0cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 115 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT color LCD monitor
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 200 thousand dot
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1700 secs
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175 grams (0.39 lbs) 670 grams (1.48 lbs)
Dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $109 $450