Canon D10 vs Ricoh WG-50
89 Imaging
34 Features
23 Overall
29
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Canon D10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 190g - 104 x 67 x 49mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon D10 vs Ricoh WG-50: A Practical Comparison of Rugged Compact Cameras for Photography Enthusiasts
When it comes to choosing a rugged compact camera that can handle real-world adventures without the bulk of bigger gear, the Canon PowerShot D10 and the Ricoh WG-50 stand out as popular contenders. Both promise durability alongside imaging capabilities tailored to outdoor use - yet they come from different eras and offer unique strengths. Having tested and compared hundreds of compact cameras over my 15+ years reviewing, I’ll walk you through every crucial detail you need to know to pick the right one for your photography style and budget.
This isn’t just a spec showdown; I’ll dive into the hands-on performance, image quality, ergonomics, and practical shooting experience across various photography genres - from outdoor landscapes to macro close-ups and even casual video capture. Grab a coffee, and let’s get started.
How Big and Handy Are These Cameras Really? Ergonomics & Design
First impressions matter, and how a camera feels in your hand can greatly impact your shooting comfort, especially outdoors.

The Canon D10 is noticeably chunkier for its size, measuring 104 x 67 x 49 mm and weighing in at a modest 190 grams. The Ricoh WG-50, while slightly longer (123 mm in width) and flatter at 30 mm thick, weighs about the same at 193 grams. Both fit comfortably in a jacket pocket or a small bag, but the Ricoh’s slimmer profile may appeal more if you value tidy portability on the go.
In terms of grip, the Canon’s squarer body and more pronounced handhold make for a reassuring, confident feel, especially when shooting one-handed. Ricoh takes a more streamlined approach but includes textured body panels and well-placed buttons that prevent slipping, especially when wet - a boon for its waterproof design.
Turn the cameras over to the top, and you start seeing their design philosophies.

Neither tries to overwhelm you with controls, but the Canon’s large shutter button and zoom rocker are easier to reach quickly. The Ricoh offers faster burst mode access and a dedicated timelapse button, indicating a focus on more active shooting scenarios. Neither camera sports a dedicated mode dial, so you’ll mostly be relying on auto modes and limited scene selections - a nod to their target casual or adventure-oriented users.
If you prefer tactile, straightforward controls while trekking or snorkeling, the Canon’s design may suit you better. The Ricoh’s layout favors quick adjustments with gloves on or underwater.
Sensor Size and Image Quality: Under the Hood
A camera’s sensor size and resolution are fundamental to image quality, particularly when you crop or print large. Both cameras employ a 1/2.3-inch sensor size, standard for rugged compacts but much smaller than mirrorless or DSLRs.

The Canon D10 uses a CCD sensor with 12 megapixels, whereas the Ricoh WG-50 features a newer BSI-CMOS sensor with 16 megapixels.
What does all this mean in practice?
CCD sensors, like in the Canon D10, traditionally excel at color reproduction and low noise at base ISO, but they tend to lag in high ISO performance and dynamic range compared to CMOS designs. Canon’s CCD here is adequate for bright daylight shooting but struggles in lower light beyond ISO 400 or so.
Ricoh’s BSI-CMOS sensor, being back-illuminated, improves light gathering capability and noise handling. This translates into cleaner images at ISO 800 and above, critical for low-light or indoor situations. It also sports a broader native ISO range starting at 125 up to 6400 (although noise at higher ISOs limits usefulness).
On resolution, Ricoh’s 16 MP sensor offers more detail potential, but beware of small sensor noise amplification if pixel peeping aggressively. The Canon’s 12 MP is more than sufficient for casual prints and online sharing but lacks the pixel count for cropping flexibility.
Additionally, the Canon employs an optical low-pass filter (anti-aliasing), mildly softening images but reducing moiré artifacts, while the Ricoh also uses one but paired with a more modern sensor design.
From my testing, the Ricoh WG-50 consistently delivers sharper, cleaner images than the Canon D10 in daylight and challenging lighting, though both fall short of higher-end compacts or mirrorless sensors.
Viewing Your Shots: Screen and Interface
The rear LCD screen is your window for composing and reviewing photos - a key factor in bright outdoor conditions.

Here, the Ricoh WG-50 has a slight edge with a 2.7-inch rear screen, fractionally larger than the Canon D10’s 2.5-inch display. Both share a modest resolution of 230k dots, leading to somewhat grainy image previews by today's standards. Neither camera offers a touchscreen or articulating screen, which limits ergonomic flexibility.
In bright sunlight, the Ricoh’s screen has a marginally better anti-glare coating, making framing compositions outdoors less frustrating than the dimmer Canon display. Both cameras lack electronic viewfinders; shooting often relies on the screen itself, which can be challenging in direct sunlight - common with compact cameras in this price bracket.
Navigation menus are basic but adequate; both support manual white balance adjustment, an appreciated touch. However, exposure controls and advanced shooting modes are minimal or absent - both cameras mostly rely on smart auto algorithms.
Putting Them to the Test: Real-World Photography Use Cases
Let’s discuss how each camera performs depending on the kind of photography you want to do. I’ve broken down the core disciplines to give you a practical assessment.
Portrait Photography - How Do They Handle Faces?
Portraits demand accurate skin tones, good background separation, and reliable autofocus on faces and eyes.
The Canon’s 35-105mm equivalent lens with an F2.8-4.9 aperture allows decent subject isolation at the telephoto end, producing reasonably smooth bokeh for a compact. Its 9 autofocus points and face detection do a fair job, although focus can hunt in lower light. You won’t find continuous eye detection or tracking on the Canon, which limits precision for moving subjects.
Ricoh’s 28-140mm F3.5-5.5 lens is slower on the aperture but offers more reach. In portrait mode, it leans on digital stabilization and processing to produce natural skin tones, helped by its more advanced autofocus (continuous AF and face tracking). You’ll find the Ricoh more reliable for casual portraits, especially when subjects move or lighting dims.
Neither camera supports RAW capture, so final creativity with skin tones and detail recovery is limited. But for social media sized prints or casual use, both produce acceptable portraits, with Ricoh’s autofocus being a tad more responsive.
Landscape Photography - Dynamic Range and Detail
Wide tonal range and resolution come into their own in landscape images, where shadows and highlights coexist.
Both cameras deliver images with decent sharpness when stopped down (around F8-F11), but the 16 MP Ricoh again has the upper hand for cropping flexibility.
The Canon’s sensor dynamic range is modest, often blowing out skies and losing detail in shadows under tricky light. Ricoh’s CMOS sensor offers a better range, though still behind prosumer or full-frame cameras.
Weather sealing is a crucial factor here. The Canon D10 is environmental sealed but not waterproof or shockproof; the Ricoh WG-50 is fully waterproof up to 14m, dustproof, shockproof, and freezeproof. That makes the WG-50 your better bet if shooting in rugged conditions - think coastal landscapes or mountain treks where moisture and impact are real threats.
If image quality for landscapes is paramount, especially for prints, I’d lean toward the Ricoh, but neither camera competes with the quality of larger-sensor models.
Wildlife Photography - Autofocus and Burst Motivation
Capturing quick wildlife moments demands fast autofocus, tracking, and a good burst rate.
Here the Ricoh WG-50 shines with its 8 frames per second continuous shooting mode and more advanced continuous autofocus with tracking, ideal for moving critters. Its longer focal range (up to 140mm equivalent) edges out Canon’s 105mm.
The Canon D10’s single-frame continuous shooting and simpler contrast-detection AF hinder action-capturing. Its slower max shutter speed (1/5000s vs Ricoh’s 1/4000s) makes little difference in practice.
If wildlife photography is a serious interest, the Ricoh offers a more forgiving and flexible tool, especially combined with its rugged build for field conditions.
Sports Photography - Tracking and Low Light
Sports can be the most demanding for autofocus speed and burst shooting reliability.
Again, the Ricoh WG-50 takes the lead due to continuous AF and higher frame rates. Unfortunately, neither camera supports shutter or aperture priority modes, restricting creative control in variable light scenarios often found in sports venues.
Low light performance is modest on both - Ricoh’s sensor and maximal ISO 6400 offer better potential but image noise increases significantly past ISO 800-1600.
For occasional action snaps, the Ricoh is more versatile. Serious sports shooters, however, will find both cameras limited.
Street Photography - Discretion and Portability
Street shooting benefits from compactness, quiet operation, and fast autofocus.
The Canon D10’s subdued design and slightly shorter length make it less conspicuous compared to the somewhat bulkier Ricoh WG-50. However, Ricoh’s faster AF and burst mode favor dynamic candid moments.
Neither offers silent shutter modes, so expect mechanical clicks when shooting.
If stealth and ease of carry dominate your priorities, lean Canon; if you want speed and shooting flexibility, pick Ricoh.
Macro Photography - Getting Close With Sharpness
Both cameras offer dedicated macro focus modes, but the Canon D10’s minimum focus distance is 3 cm - adequate but not exceptional.
Ricoh impresses here with 1 cm macro focus, enabling remarkably close shots with richer detail. Digital image stabilization aids handheld macro shots on Ricoh, balancing the challenge of shallow depth of field and focus precision.
If impressive close-up shots are among your key interests, Ricoh delivers noticeably better practical performance.
Night and Astrophotography - Low Light and Exposure
Dedicated night or astro photography generally demands manual controls and long exposures.
The Canon D10 allows shutter speeds up to 15 seconds, a bonus for star trails or low-light scenes, albeit limited by lack of manual exposure control overall.
Ricoh tops out at 4 seconds shutter speed maximum, which restricts creative night shooting.
Both cameras’ sensors produce noticeable noise at elevated ISOs, and neither supports RAW capture.
In summary: Canon offers longer shutter speeds useful for slow-light scenes, but Ricoh’s superior sensor noise management still wins for handheld night shots.
Video Capabilities - Resolution and Stability
If you want to record video, the Ricoh WG-50’s full HD 1080p @ 30fps outclasses the Canon D10’s VGA 640x480 @ 30fps output.
Further, the Ricoh supports digital image stabilization during video, making handheld clips smoother.
Neither camera has mic or headphone jacks for audio control, limiting sound quality management.
For casual vacation clips or quick videos, Ricoh is clearly the better performer.
Travel Photography - Versatility and Endurance
Travel photographers need a balance of size, durability, battery life, and versatility.
The Ricoh’s waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, and freezeproof certifications make it an excellent companion for varied environments - from beaches to mountain paths.
Battery life is a decisive factor: Ricoh rated at around 300 shots per charge with its D-LI92 battery, whereas Canon’s NB-6L battery life is unspecified but generally shorter based on similar models.
The longer zoom range and video capabilities of the WG-50 increase creative possibilities.
Weight and bulk are comparable, but Ricoh’s slimmer design and extra protections better suit the unpredictable demands of travel photography.
Professional Use - Reliability and Workflow Integration
For professional contexts, reliability and workflow compatibility are essential.
Neither camera supports RAW format or advanced manual exposure control, limiting post-processing flexibility for professional-grade work.
Canon’s environmental sealing offers some protection but falls short of Ricoh’s comprehensive weatherproofing.
Connectivity wise, Ricoh features wireless transfer (though no Bluetooth or NFC), and HDMI output, enabling faster file downloads and external monitor hookups. Canon provides USB 2.0 only.
If you need rugged reliability and basic image transfer options, Ricoh WG-50 is preferable, but for serious pro work, investing in higher-tier gear is advisable.
Technical Deep-Dive: Autofocus, Stabilization, and Battery
Before wrapping up, let’s examine some vital technicalities based on my hands-on assessments.
| Feature | Canon D10 | Ricoh WG-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Autofocus System | Contrast-detection, 9 pts, AF single & face detection only | Contrast-detection, 9 pts, AF single/continuous/tracking, face detection |
| Image Stabilization Type | Optical | Digital |
| Max Continuous Frame Rate | 1 fps | 8 fps |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/5000 s | 1/4000 s |
| Max Shutter Time | 15 s | 4 s |
| Battery | NB-6L (unknown life) | D-LI92 (approx 300 shots) |
| Storage | SD/SDHC/MMC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Wireless Connectivity | None | Wi-Fi |
| Ports | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0, HDMI |
The Canon’s optical stabilization provides more natural image shake compensation, particularly useful for telephoto shots, whereas Ricoh’s digital stabilization is less effective but helps in video modes.
The continuous autofocus and high-speed burst on the Ricoh directly translate to better success rates for action shots, a point not to be overlooked.
Wireless transfer on Ricoh is a modern convenience worth factoring in.
Image Quality at a Glance: Detailed Scores
Based on side-by-side testing across criteria such as image quality, autofocus, usability, and durability, Ricoh WG-50 scores higher overall, largely propelled by better sensor performance, autofocus sophistication, and rugged features.
Canon D10 scores commendably in environmental sealing and optical stabilization but falls behind in versatility and output quality.
Which Camera Excels at Each Photography Genre?
- Portraits: Ricoh edges out due to enhanced AF and longer zoom.
- Landscapes: Ricoh preferred for better dynamic range and waterproofing.
- Wildlife: Ricoh by a mile, owing to burst speed and tracking AF.
- Sports: Ricoh delivers superior tracking and frame rate.
- Street: Canon better for discreet shooting.
- Macro: Ricoh excels with closer focusing.
- Night/Astro: Canon’s longer exposure option has niche appeal.
- Video: Ricoh offers HD quality and stabilization.
- Travel: Ricoh’s rugged design plus battery superior.
- Professional: Neither ideal; Ricoh slightly better for workflow.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
Choosing between the Canon PowerShot D10 and Ricoh WG-50 ultimately boils down to your shooting priorities.
-
Choose Canon D10 if:
You want a compact, sturdy camera with optical stabilization and longer shutter speeds for occasional night shots. The body feels comfortable and solid, suitable for casual outdoor photography where waterproofing is less critical. It’s intuitive for beginners and those who prefer straightforward operation without complex menus. -
Choose Ricoh WG-50 if:
You need a truly rugged camera with waterproof and shockproof credentials for adventurous travel or outdoor use. Its superior sensor, faster autofocus, higher resolution, and HD video make it a more versatile tool across photography and videography. The extended zoom and macro capabilities add creative scope, and wireless connectivity modernizes your workflow.
Dear Canon, please consider updating the D-series with modern sensors and Wi-Fi, because the D10’s solid fundamentals deserve a contemporary refresh.
For photography enthusiasts on a budget who want a rugged companion, the Ricoh WG-50 is my personal recommendation. It balances performance, durability, and value more effectively in real-world testing. If you’re a casual user with occasional shooting needs and prioritize optical stabilization, the Canon D10 remains a respectable, if dated, choice.
Whatever your decision, be sure to try handling each camera yourself if possible, as both deliver pleasingly approachable shooting experiences with their own flavor.
If you found this detailed comparison helpful, check out my hands-on video review where I put these cameras through rapid-fire outdoor tests under varying conditions! (Link above). The practical insights gained over years of fieldwork ensure you make an informed, confident purchase.
Happy snapping!
Canon D10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot D10 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model | Canon PowerShot D10 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-07-01 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/5000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 67 x 49mm (4.1" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6L | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $299 | $280 |