Clicky

Canon 160 vs Olympus E-620

Portability
96
Imaging
46
Features
26
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot ELPH 160 front
 
Olympus E-620 front
Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48

Canon 160 vs Olympus E-620 Key Specs

Canon 160
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
  • 127g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
  • Released January 2015
  • Additionally referred to as IXUS 160
Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Released July 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon 160 vs Olympus E-620 Overview

Below, we will be evaluating the Canon 160 and Olympus E-620, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Canon and Olympus. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the 160 (20MP) and E-620 (12MP) and the 160 (1/2.3") and E-620 (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor sizing.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The 160 was manufactured 5 years after the E-620 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Canon 160 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the 160 scores vs the E-620 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon 160 over the Olympus E-620

 160 E-620 
ReleasedJanuary 2015July 2009Newer by 67 months

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Canon 160

 E-620 160 
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Canon 160 and Olympus E-620

 160 E-620 
Screen dimension2.7"2.7"Identical screen measurement
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Canon 160 vs Olympus E-620 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon 160 has got external dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") with a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Olympus E-620 has measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") and a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).

Contrast the Canon 160 and Olympus E-620 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the 160 versus the E-620.

Canon 160 vs Olympus E-620 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the 160 and E-620 is 96 and 71 respectively.

Canon 160 vs Olympus E-620 top view buttons comparison

Canon 160 vs Olympus E-620 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out technical specs. The picture here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 160 and E-620.

As you have seen, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The 160 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Canon 160 will show extra detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent 160 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.

Canon 160 vs Olympus E-620 sensor size comparison

Canon 160 vs Olympus E-620 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon 160 vs Olympus E-620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon 160 Portrait photography advice
Olympus E-620 Portrait photography advice
39
decent MP (20 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
60
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (12MP)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Canon 160 Street photography details
Olympus E-620 Street photography details
59
image stabilization (Digital)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
76
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon 160
Sports photography with Olympus E-620
44
image stabilization (Digital)
decent MP (20MP)
supports tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (0.8 frames per second)
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
48
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
slow frames per second (4.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (12MP)
terrible battery life (500 per charge)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Canon 160 Travel photography highlights
Olympus E-620 Travel photography highlights
67
decent MP (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
no Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
53
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
does not have Timelapse function
terrible battery life (500 shots)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Canon 160 Landscape photography information
Olympus E-620 Landscape photography information
41
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
decent MP (20MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual control
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Timelapse function
53
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
low megapixels (12MP)
terrible battery life (500 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Canon 160 Vlogging features
Olympus E-620 Vlogging features
32
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
supports face detection focus
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone socket
18
no video shooting
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon 160 vs Olympus E-620 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon 160 and Olympus E-620
 Canon PowerShot ELPH 160Olympus E-620
General Information
Make Canon Olympus
Model Canon PowerShot ELPH 160 Olympus E-620
Also Known as IXUS 160 -
Category Ultracompact Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2015-01-06 2009-07-06
Physical type Ultracompact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 4+ TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5152 x 3864 4032 x 3024
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 9 7
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 28-224mm (8.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.2-6.9 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Available lenses - 45
Crop factor 5.8 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display sizing 2.7" 2.7"
Display resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech - HyperCrystal LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.48x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 0.8 frames per sec 4.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 12.00 m
Flash modes Auto, on, off, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 127 gr (0.28 lbs) 500 gr (1.10 lbs)
Dimensions 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 55
DXO Color Depth score not tested 21.3
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.3
DXO Low light score not tested 536
Other
Battery life 220 photographs 500 photographs
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NB-11L/LH BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $135 $799