Clicky

Canon 160 vs Sony QX1

Portability
96
Imaging
46
Features
26
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot ELPH 160 front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
63
Features
48
Overall
57

Canon 160 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Canon 160
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
  • 127g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2015
  • Alternate Name is IXUS 160
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Launched September 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon 160 vs Sony QX1 Overview

In this article, we will be comparing the Canon 160 versus Sony QX1, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Lens-style by companies Canon and Sony. The sensor resolution of the 160 (20MP) and the QX1 (20MP) is pretty close but the 160 (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The 160 was manufactured 5 months later than the QX1 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon 160 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before going in to a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the 160 matches up against the QX1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon 160 over the Sony QX1

 160 QX1 
Screen sizing2.7""Bigger screen (+2.7")
Screen resolution230k0kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Canon 160

 QX1 160 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Canon 160 and Sony QX1

 160 QX1 
LaunchedJanuary 2015September 2014Same generation
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Canon 160 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon 160 enjoys outside measurements of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") along with a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Sony QX1 has dimensions of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Check the Canon 160 versus Sony QX1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the 160 compared to the QX1.

Canon 160 vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the 160 and QX1 is 96 and 90 respectively.

Canon 160 vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Canon 160 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements purely by researching specs. The visual below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the 160 and QX1.

As you can plainly see, both cameras offer the same exact MP albeit different sensor measurements. The 160 has the smaller sensor which should make obtaining bokeh more challenging.

Canon 160 vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Canon 160 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon 160 vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon 160
Portrait photography with Sony QX1
39
MP count good (20MP)
comes with face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
66
manual focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon 160
Street photography with Sony QX1
59
has image stabilization (Digital)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
69
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
features focus via touch
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than competitors in class (216 grams)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon 160
Sports photography with Sony QX1
44
has image stabilization (Digital)
MP count good (20MP)
comes with tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (0.8 fps)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
56
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
good battery life (440 shots)
max frames per second low (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Canon 160 as a Travel photography camera
Sony QX1 as a Travel photography camera
67
MP count good (20MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
71
good battery life (440 CIPA)
features focus via touch
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors in class (216g)
does not feature selfie friendly display
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Canon 160 Landscape photography highlights
Sony QX1 Landscape photography highlights
41
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse recording
64
manual focus
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (440 per charge)
small screen ( inch)
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
no Timelapse recording
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Canon 160 as a Vlogging camera
Sony QX1 as a Vlogging camera
32
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
comes with face detect autofocus
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone socket
32
touchscreen enabled
comes with face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
no external microphone jack
more heavy than competitors in class (216 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon 160 vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon 160 and Sony QX1
 Canon PowerShot ELPH 160Sony Alpha QX1
General Information
Company Canon Sony
Model type Canon PowerShot ELPH 160 Sony Alpha QX1
Also referred to as IXUS 160 -
Category Ultracompact Lens-style
Launched 2015-01-06 2014-09-03
Body design Ultracompact Lens-style
Sensor Information
Powered by DIGIC 4+ Bionz X
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 5152 x 3864 5456 x 3632
Highest native ISO 1600 16000
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony E
Lens zoom range 28-224mm (8.0x) -
Max aperture f/3.2-6.9 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.6
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inch -
Display resolution 230k dot 0k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 0.8 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, on, off, slow synchro Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 127g (0.28 lbs) 216g (0.48 lbs)
Dimensions 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 photos 440 photos
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NB-11L/LH NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $135 $500