Canon ELPH 180 vs Olympus E-M1 III
Portability
96 Imaging
46 Features
24 Overall
37
96 Imaging
46 Features
24 Overall
37
Portability
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
Canon ELPH 180 vs Olympus E-M1 III Key Specs
Canon ELPH 180
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 126g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2016
Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
Photography Glossary Canon ELPH 180 vs Olympus E-M1 III Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Canon ELPH 180 vs Olympus E-M1 III, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the ELPH 180 (20MP) and the E-M1 III (20MP) is relatively close but the ELPH 180 (1/2.3") and E-M1 III (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe ELPH 180 was launched 5 years earlier than the E-M1 III which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Canon ELPH 180 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summary of how the ELPH 180 matches up against the E-M1 III in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon ELPH 180 vs Olympus E-M1 III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot ELPH 180 & Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III. The complete galleries are available at Canon ELPH 180 Gallery & Olympus E-M1 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 180 over the Olympus E-M1 III
| ELPH 180 | E-M1 III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Canon ELPH 180
| E-M1 III | ELPH 180 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2020 |  | January 2016 | More modern by 49 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 180 and Olympus E-M1 III
| ELPH 180 | E-M1 III |
|---|
Canon ELPH 180 vs Olympus E-M1 III Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon ELPH 180 has got outer measurements of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 III has measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).
Look at the Canon ELPH 180 vs Olympus E-M1 III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the ELPH 180 compared to the E-M1 III.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 180 and E-M1 III is 96 and 67 respectively.
Canon ELPH 180 vs Olympus E-M1 III Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching specifications. The picture underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the ELPH 180 and E-M1 III.
Plainly, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact MP albeit not the same sensor sizes. The ELPH 180 has got the smaller sensor which should make getting bokeh more difficult. The more aged ELPH 180 will be behind in sensor technology.
Canon ELPH 180 vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon ELPH 180 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography highlights
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
features face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
focusing manually
decent MP (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Canon ELPH 180 Street photography features
Olympus E-M1 III Street photography features
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
boasts focus via touch
weather proof
above average high ISO (25,600)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sports photography with Canon ELPH 180
Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 III
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
slow fps (0.8 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
high max frames per second (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
weather proof
sensor has phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Canon ELPH 180 Travel photography information
Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography information
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
weather proof
supports bluetooth
boasts focus via touch
decent MP (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Canon ELPH 180 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-M1 III as a Landscape photography camera
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Timelapse recording
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
does not have anti-alias filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
weather proof
two card slots
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Canon ELPH 180 Vlogging highlights
Olympus E-M1 III Vlogging highlights
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone jack
selfie friendly screen
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect focusing
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 resolution)
includes microphone socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon ELPH 180 vs Olympus E-M1 III Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 180 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 180 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III |
| Class | Ultracompact | Pro Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2016-01-05 | 2020-02-11 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 4+ | TruePic IX |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 5152 x 3864 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW support | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 121 |
| Cross focus points | - | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 107 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,037k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 0.8fps | 60.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 4096x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 126g (0.28 lbs) | 580g (1.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | 420 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-11LH | BLH-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
| Card slots | 1 | Dual |
| Launch price | $119 | $1,800 |
