Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus E-M10 II
95 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 144g - 97 x 56 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Also Known as IXUS 255 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Canon ELPH 330 HS versus Olympus E-M10 II, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Canon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the ELPH 330 HS (12MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) and the ELPH 330 HS (1/2.3") and E-M10 II (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe ELPH 330 HS was released 3 years prior to the E-M10 II which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Canon ELPH 330 HS being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a simple overview of how the ELPH 330 HS matches up versus the E-M10 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus E-M10 II Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot ELPH 330 HS & Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. The complete galleries are provided at Canon ELPH 330 HS Gallery & Olympus E-M10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 330 HS over the Olympus E-M10 II
ELPH 330 HS | E-M10 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Canon ELPH 330 HS
E-M10 II | ELPH 330 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | January 2013 | More modern by 31 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 461k | Sharper display (+579k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 330 HS and Olympus E-M10 II
ELPH 330 HS | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon ELPH 330 HS has exterior measurements of 97mm x 56mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 II has sizing of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
Contrast the Canon ELPH 330 HS versus Olympus E-M10 II in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the ELPH 330 HS versus the E-M10 II.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 330 HS and E-M10 II is 95 and 82 respectively.
Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes only by looking at technical specs. The image below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the ELPH 330 HS and E-M10 II.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The ELPH 330 HS featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus E-M10 II will give extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged ELPH 330 HS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications
Canon PowerShot ELPH 330 HS | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon PowerShot ELPH 330 HS | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
Also Known as | IXUS 255 HS | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2015-08-25 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | DIGIC 5 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | PureColor II G | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.80 m (ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, on, slow sync, off | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 144g (0.32 lb) | 390g (0.86 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 56 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 842 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | 320 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-4L | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $179 | $499 |