Clicky

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

Portability
95
Imaging
40
Features
39
Overall
39
Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS front
 
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 front
Portability
88
Imaging
53
Features
37
Overall
46

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs

Canon ELPH 340 HS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1280 video
  • 25-300mm (F3.6-7.0) lens
  • 147g - 100 x 58 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2014
  • Also Known as IXUS 265 HS
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28mm (F2.5) lens
  • 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
  • Revealed September 2010
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview

Let's look much closer at the Canon ELPH 340 HS versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Canon and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the ELPH 340 HS (16MP) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and the ELPH 340 HS (1/2.3") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The ELPH 340 HS was introduced 3 years after the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon ELPH 340 HS being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a short view of how the ELPH 340 HS scores vs the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 340 HS over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

 ELPH 340 HS GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 
RevealedJanuary 2014September 2010More modern by 41 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Canon ELPH 340 HS

 GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 ELPH 340 HS 
Screen resolution920k461kSharper screen (+459k dot)

Common features in the Canon ELPH 340 HS and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

 ELPH 340 HS GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Canon ELPH 340 HS has got outer dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has sizing of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).

Look at the Canon ELPH 340 HS versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the ELPH 340 HS compared to the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 340 HS and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 95 and 88 respectively.

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 top view buttons comparison

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by researching technical specs. The image here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the ELPH 340 HS and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

As you have seen, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The ELPH 340 HS having a smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Canon ELPH 340 HS will provide you with greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more recent ELPH 340 HS will have an edge in sensor innovation.

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 sensor size comparison

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon ELPH 340 HS Portrait photography info
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Portrait photography info
41
manual focus
MP count decent (16MP)
supports face detection focusing
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
58
has manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
features face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
does not have liveview
low resolution (12MP)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon ELPH 340 HS
Street photography with Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
more heavy than average in class (147g)
70
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lighter than others in class (140 grams)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Canon ELPH 340 HS Sports photography factors
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sports photography factors
34
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery (190 per charge)
no phase detect AF
32
sensor size is good (APS-C)
fixed focal length (28mm)
does not have liveview
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low resolution (12MP)
terrible battery (320 per charge)
lack of phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Canon ELPH 340 HS as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 as a Travel photography camera
63
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
not so great battery (190 per charge)
more heavy than average in class (147g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
59
lighter than others in class (140g)
flash built-in
terrible battery (320 per charge)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Canon ELPH 340 HS Landscape photography info
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Landscape photography info
46
manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
manual mode not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
not so great battery (190 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
48
has manual focus
screen is a good size (3")
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
low resolution (12 megapixels)
terrible battery (320 shots)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Canon ELPH 340 HS Vlogging factors
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Vlogging factors
33
pretty wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1280 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone support
more heavy than average in class (147 grams)
28
features face detect focusing
lighter than others in class (140 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon ELPH 340 HS and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
 Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HSRicoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
General Information
Brand Canon Ricoh
Model type Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
Also called as IXUS 265 HS -
Type Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2014-01-06 2010-09-21
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 4+ GR Engine III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 2848
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-300mm (12.0x) 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.6-7.0 f/2.5
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of display 461 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology TFT LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 secs 180 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/3200 secs
Continuous shooting speed 4.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1280 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1280 1280x720
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 147 gr (0.32 lb) 140 gr (0.31 lb)
Dimensions 100 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 190 images 320 images
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NB-11LH DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $199 $566