Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Leica M-E Typ 220
95 Imaging
46 Features
39 Overall
43
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.6-7.0) lens
- 147g - 100 x 58 x 23mm
- Released February 2015
- Other Name is IXUS 275 HS
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Announced September 2012
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Canon ELPH 350 HS versus Leica M-E Typ 220, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by companies Canon and Leica. The image resolution of the ELPH 350 HS (20MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) is relatively similar but the ELPH 350 HS (1/2.3") and M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) offer different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe ELPH 350 HS was introduced 2 years after the M-E Typ 220 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Canon ELPH 350 HS being a Ultracompact camera and the Leica M-E Typ 220 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a concise summation of how the ELPH 350 HS grades vs the M-E Typ 220 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS and Leica M-E Typ 220. The whole galleries are available at Canon ELPH 350 HS Gallery and Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 350 HS over the Leica M-E Typ 220
ELPH 350 HS | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | September 2012 | Newer by 30 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Canon ELPH 350 HS
M-E Typ 220 | ELPH 350 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 350 HS and Leica M-E Typ 220
ELPH 350 HS | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon ELPH 350 HS provides outer dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Leica M-E Typ 220 has proportions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).
See the Canon ELPH 350 HS versus Leica M-E Typ 220 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the ELPH 350 HS vs the M-E Typ 220.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 350 HS and M-E Typ 220 is 95 and 79 respectively.
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading specs. The pic underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 350 HS and M-E Typ 220.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The ELPH 350 HS having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Canon ELPH 350 HS will offer you more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher ELPH 350 HS should have an edge in sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Specifications
Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS | Leica M-E Typ 220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Leica |
Model type | Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS | Leica M-E Typ 220 |
Otherwise known as | IXUS 275 HS | - |
Type | Ultracompact | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2015-02-06 | 2012-09-17 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | DIGIC 4+ | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5212 x 3472 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 2500 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Leica M |
Lens zoom range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.6-7.0 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 59 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.5 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, flash on, slow synchro, flash off | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 147 gr (0.32 pounds) | 585 gr (1.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 787 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-11LH | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $219 | $0 |