Clicky

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300

Portability
95
Imaging
46
Features
39
Overall
43
Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS front
 
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
50
Overall
44

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Key Specs

Canon ELPH 360 HS
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-300mm (F3.6-7.0) lens
  • 147g - 100 x 58 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2016
Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Revealed May 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Overview

The following is a complete comparison of the Canon ELPH 360 HS versus Casio EX-ZR300, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Canon and Casio. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the ELPH 360 HS (20MP) and EX-ZR300 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The ELPH 360 HS was released 3 years after the EX-ZR300 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Canon ELPH 360 HS being a Ultracompact camera and the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera.

Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the ELPH 360 HS grades against the EX-ZR300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 360 HS over the Casio EX-ZR300

 ELPH 360 HS EX-ZR300 
RevealedJanuary 2016May 2012Newer by 45 months

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Canon ELPH 360 HS

 EX-ZR300 ELPH 360 HS 

Common features in the Canon ELPH 360 HS and Casio EX-ZR300

 ELPH 360 HS EX-ZR300 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Screen resolution461k461kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera often, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Canon ELPH 360 HS has got external measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-ZR300 has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).

Check out the Canon ELPH 360 HS versus Casio EX-ZR300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the ELPH 360 HS and the EX-ZR300.

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 360 HS and EX-ZR300 is 95 and 92 respectively.

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 top view buttons comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions only by checking out specs. The picture below might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the ELPH 360 HS and EX-ZR300.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Canon ELPH 360 HS to provide greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The younger ELPH 360 HS should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 sensor size comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Casio EX-ZR300 as a Portrait photography camera
44
has manual focus
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
offers face detect focusing
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
40
has manual focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS Street photography factors
Casio EX-ZR300 Street photography factors
57
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
more heavy than average (147 grams)
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon ELPH 360 HS
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR300
37
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20MP)
slow frames per second (2.5 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (180 CIPA)
lacks phase detect AF
55
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
good battery power (500 per charge)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS Travel photography information
Casio EX-ZR300 Travel photography information
64
megapixel count good (20MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (25mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
terrible battery power (180 CIPA)
more heavy than average (147 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.6)
71
good battery power (500 per charge)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS Landscape photography highlights
Casio EX-ZR300 Landscape photography highlights
48
has manual focus
quite wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.6)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
terrible battery power (180 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse recording
52
has manual focus
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
good battery power (500 per charge)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS Vlogging highlights
Casio EX-ZR300 Vlogging highlights
33
quite wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f3.6)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have microphone port
more heavy than average (147g)
33
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
doesn't have mic jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Casio EX-ZR300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon ELPH 360 HS and Casio EX-ZR300
 Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HSCasio Exilim EX-ZR300
General Information
Company Canon Casio
Model type Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS Casio Exilim EX-ZR300
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2016-01-05 2012-05-22
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip DIGIC 4+ Exilim Engine HS
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-300mm (12.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximum aperture f/3.6-7.0 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 461 thousand dot 461 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology - Super Clear TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 seconds 15 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 2.5 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m (at Auto ISO) 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, on, slow synchro, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 147 grams (0.32 pounds) 205 grams (0.45 pounds)
Physical dimensions 100 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 180 pictures 500 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NB-11LH NP-130
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $209 $329