Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Ricoh CX1
95 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 163g - 86 x 54 x 20mm
- Released February 2012
- Alternate Name is IXUS 510 HS
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Ricoh CX1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. The resolution of the ELPH 530 HS (10MP) and the CX1 (9MP) is relatively well matched and they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe ELPH 530 HS was announced 3 years later than the CX1 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the ELPH 530 HS scores against the CX1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS & Ricoh CX1. The whole galleries are available at Canon ELPH 530 HS Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 530 HS over the Ricoh CX1
| ELPH 530 HS | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2012 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 37 months |
| Screen dimension | 3.2" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Canon ELPH 530 HS
| CX1 | ELPH 530 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Ricoh CX1
| ELPH 530 HS | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Canon ELPH 530 HS provides outer dimensions of 86mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Ricoh CX1 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Contrast the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Ricoh CX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the ELPH 530 HS compared to the CX1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 530 HS and CX1 is 95 and 93 respectively.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to see the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through specifications. The visual here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the ELPH 530 HS and CX1.
Plainly, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Canon ELPH 530 HS to give you extra detail with its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent ELPH 530 HS is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Ricoh CX1 |
| Also called | IXUS 510 HS | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2009-02-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 5 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.2 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | PureColor II Touch TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.50 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 163 grams (0.36 lb) | 180 grams (0.40 lb) |
| Dimensions | 86 x 54 x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-9L | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $250 | $299 |
