Canon G9 X II vs Fujifilm Z35
92 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
Canon G9 X II vs Fujifilm Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Launched January 2017
- Earlier Model is Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Released July 2009
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon G9 X II vs Fujifilm Z35 Overview
Following is a complete review of the Canon G9 X II vs Fujifilm Z35, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and FujiFilm. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and the G9 X II (1") and Fujifilm Z35 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe G9 X II was launched 7 years after the Fujifilm Z35 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the G9 X II grades against the Fujifilm Z35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon G9 X II vs Fujifilm Z35 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II & Fujifilm FinePix Z35. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon G9 X II Gallery & Fujifilm Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Fujifilm Z35
| G9 X II | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2017 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 91 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Canon G9 X II
| Fujifilm Z35 | G9 X II |
|---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Fujifilm Z35
| G9 X II | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Canon G9 X II vs Fujifilm Z35 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon G9 X II has got outer dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Fujifilm Z35 has dimensions of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Canon G9 X II vs Fujifilm Z35 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the G9 X II compared to the Fujifilm Z35.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the G9 X II and Fujifilm Z35 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Canon G9 X II vs Fujifilm Z35 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through specs. The image here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the G9 X II and Fujifilm Z35.
All in all, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The G9 X II featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Canon G9 X II will give extra detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images far more aggressively. The more recent G9 X II should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon G9 X II vs Fujifilm Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon G9 X II vs Fujifilm Z35 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 |
| Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2017-01-04 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 7 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 8cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 3s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.2 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 522 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 235 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | NP-45A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $530 | $130 |
