Canon S120 vs Kodak M320
92 Imaging
38 Features
57 Overall
45
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Canon S120 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F1.8-5.7) lens
- 217g - 100 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Old Model is Canon S110
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched January 2009
Canon S120 vs Kodak M320 Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Canon S120 vs Kodak M320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Canon and Kodak. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the S120 (12MP) and M320 (9MP) and the S120 (1/1.7") and M320 (1/2.5") posses totally different sensor size.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe S120 was revealed 4 years after the M320 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Canon S120 being a Compact camera and the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the S120 grades versus the M320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon S120 vs Kodak M320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot S120 and Kodak EasyShare M320. The full galleries are available at Canon S120 Gallery and Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S120 over the Kodak M320
S120 | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 60 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Canon S120
M320 | S120 |
---|
Common features in the Canon S120 and Kodak M320
S120 | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Canon S120 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon S120 provides physical measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 29mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 217 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Kodak M320 has dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Canon S120 vs Kodak M320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the S120 and the M320.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the S120 and M320 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Canon S120 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing technical specs. The picture here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the S120 and M320.
As you have seen, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The S120 having a larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Canon S120 will deliver more detail because of its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern S120 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon S120 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon S120 vs Kodak M320 Specifications
Canon PowerShot S120 | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Kodak |
Model | Canon PowerShot S120 | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2013-11-26 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 6 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3472 x 2604 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-5.7 | f/2.8-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT PureColor II G Touch screen LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 12.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 or 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 217 gr (0.48 pounds) | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 29mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.9 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 246 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-6LH | KLIC-7001 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $449 | $39 |