Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-870
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2016
- Older Model is Olympus TG-860
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Canon S200 and Olympus TG-870, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and TG-870 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S200 was announced 22 months prior to the TG-870 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Canon S200 being a Compact camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the S200 scores versus the TG-870 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot S200 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The whole galleries are available at Canon S200 Gallery and Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Olympus TG-870
| S200 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Canon S200
| TG-870 | S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2016 |  | February 2014 | Fresher by 22 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 461k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Canon S200 and Olympus TG-870
| S200 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon S200 offers outer dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Olympus TG-870 has dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Canon S200 and Olympus TG-870 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the S200 and the TG-870.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S200 and TG-870 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizing just by going through specs. The visual below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the S200 and TG-870.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The S200 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus TG-870 will provide greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older S200 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2014-02-21 | 2016-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 181 gr (0.40 lb) | 221 gr (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $293 | $280 |
