Clicky

Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-1

Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
41
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot S200 front
 
Olympus XZ-1 front
Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41

Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs

Canon S200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
  • 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
  • Released February 2014
Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview

Let's look more in depth at the Canon S200 versus Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is relatively close but the S200 (1/1.7") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") offer different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The S200 was unveiled 3 years after the XZ-1 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the S200 grades vs the XZ-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Olympus XZ-1

 S200 XZ-1 
RevealedFebruary 2014January 2011Newer by 38 months

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Canon S200

 XZ-1 S200 
Screen resolution614k461kClearer screen (+153k dot)

Common features in the Canon S200 and Olympus XZ-1

 S200 XZ-1 
Focus manually Dial exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon S200 enjoys exterior dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon S200 versus Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the S200 against the XZ-1.

Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the S200 and XZ-1 is 93 and 88 respectively.

Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison

Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by researching specifications. The pic here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200 and XZ-1.

To sum up, both cameras feature the identical MP albeit different sensor dimensions. The S200 contains the bigger sensor which should make getting shallower DOF easier. The more recent S200 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison

Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon S200 Portrait photography info
Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography info
34
focusing manually
has face detection autofocus
no external flash support
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
no RAW files
45
focusing manually
features face detection focus
exports RAW files
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Canon S200 Street photography info
Olympus XZ-1 Street photography info
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
boasts touch to focus
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
no RAW files
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
heavier than others (275g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Canon S200 Sports photography details
Olympus XZ-1 Sports photography details
32
has image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
low battery pack (200 per charge)
no phase detect autofocus
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking autofocus
great battery power (320 CIPA)
max fps low (2.0 frames per second)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Canon S200 Travel photography details
Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography details
64
boasts touch to focus
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
lack of Time Lapse mode
low battery pack (200 shots)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
62
great battery power (320 CIPA)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than others (275 grams)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Canon S200 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus XZ-1 Landscape photography highlights
46
focusing manually
pretty wide (24mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
no RAW files
low battery pack (200 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse mode
54
focusing manually
fairly wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
great battery power (320 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Canon S200 Vlogging features
Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging features
33
pretty wide (24mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
does not have selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic jack
31
fairly wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focus
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic socket
heavier than others (275g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon S200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon S200 and Olympus XZ-1
 Canon PowerShot S200Olympus XZ-1
General Information
Make Canon Olympus
Model Canon PowerShot S200 Olympus XZ-1
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2014-02-21 2011-01-26
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Digic 5 TruePic V
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/1.63"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 8.07 x 5.56mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 44.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 3664 x 2752
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 9 11
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-120mm (5.0x) 28-112mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.0-5.9 f/1.8-2.5
Macro focus distance 3cm 1cm
Crop factor 4.8 4.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 461k dots 614k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology - OLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 7.00 m 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 181 gr (0.40 lbs) 275 gr (0.61 lbs)
Physical dimensions 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 34
DXO Color Depth score not tested 18.8
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.4
DXO Low light score not tested 117
Other
Battery life 200 shots 320 shots
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NB-6LH Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $293 $567