Canon S95 vs Olympus FE-4000
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Canon S95 vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Released November 2010
- Previous Model is Canon S90
- Newer Model is Canon S100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-925
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon S95 vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview
Below is a extended comparison of the Canon S95 and Olympus FE-4000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S95 (10MP) and the FE-4000 (12MP) is relatively close but the S95 (1/1.7") and FE-4000 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S95 was brought out 17 months later than the FE-4000 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the S95 grades vs the FE-4000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon S95 vs Olympus FE-4000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot S95 & Olympus FE-4000. The entire galleries are available at Canon S95 Gallery & Olympus FE-4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Olympus FE-4000
| S95 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2010 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 17 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Canon S95
| FE-4000 | S95 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S95 and Olympus FE-4000
| S95 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Canon S95 vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Canon S95 provides outside dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Olympus FE-4000 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Check the Canon S95 and Olympus FE-4000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the S95 versus the FE-4000.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the S95 and FE-4000 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Canon S95 vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements purely by researching specifications. The graphic below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the S95 and FE-4000.
Plainly, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The S95 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus FE-4000 will provide you with greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern S95 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon S95 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon S95 vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S95 | Olympus FE-4000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S95 | Olympus FE-4000 |
| Otherwise known as | - | X-925 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-11-23 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.6-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.50 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/500s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 195 gr (0.43 lbs) | 136 gr (0.30 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 47 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 153 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | - | 1 |
| Retail price | $495 | $130 |