Canon S95 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
93 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Canon S95 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Announced November 2010
- Replaced the Canon S90
- Updated by Canon S100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2012
Canon S95 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Overview
Here is a in depth comparison of the Canon S95 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the S95 (10MP) and Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) and the S95 (1/1.7") and Galaxy Camera 4G (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe S95 was introduced 21 months before the Galaxy Camera 4G which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise overview of how the S95 matches up vs the Galaxy Camera 4G with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Canon S95 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot S95 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon S95 Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
S95 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 461k | 0k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Canon S95
Galaxy Camera 4G | S95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2012 | November 2010 | Fresher by 21 months | |
Screen dimension | 4.8" | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon S95 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
S95 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Canon S95 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon S95 enjoys external measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G has dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon S95 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the S95 against the Galaxy Camera 4G.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S95 and Galaxy Camera 4G is 93 and 90 respectively.
Canon S95 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor sizing just by going over a spec sheet. The graphic here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the S95 and Galaxy Camera 4G.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The S95 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G will offer you greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The older S95 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon S95 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon S95 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Specifications
Canon PowerShot S95 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Samsung |
Model | Canon PowerShot S95 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-11-23 | 2012-08-29 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 4 | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | - |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 4.8 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/500 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 195g (0.43 lbs) | 305g (0.67 lbs) |
Dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 47 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 153 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NB-6L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Card slots | - | One |
Cost at launch | $495 | $550 |