Clicky

Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus E-300

Portability
85
Imaging
35
Features
33
Overall
34
Canon PowerShot SX130 IS front
 
Olympus E-300 front
Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37

Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus E-300 Key Specs

Canon SX130 IS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
  • 308g - 113 x 73 x 46mm
  • Introduced August 2010
  • Renewed by Canon SX150 IS
Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Introduced January 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Renewed by Olympus E-330
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus E-300 Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Canon SX130 IS versus Olympus E-300, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Canon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the SX130 IS (12MP) and E-300 (8MP) and the SX130 IS (1/2.3") and E-300 (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The SX130 IS was launched 5 years later than the E-300 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX130 IS being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the SX130 IS grades versus the E-300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX130 IS over the Olympus E-300

 SX130 IS E-300 
IntroducedAugust 2010January 2005Fresher by 69 months
Screen sizing3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution230k134kSharper screen (+96k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Canon SX130 IS

 E-300 SX130 IS 

Common features in the Canon SX130 IS and Olympus E-300

 SX130 IS E-300 
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus E-300 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry your camera, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX130 IS has external dimensions of 113mm x 73mm x 46mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.8") having a weight of 308 grams (0.68 lbs) while the Olympus E-300 has proportions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs).

Look at the Canon SX130 IS versus Olympus E-300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the SX130 IS against the E-300.

Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus E-300 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX130 IS and E-300 is 85 and 67 respectively.

Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus E-300 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus E-300 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by looking through specifications. The visual below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX130 IS and E-300.

Plainly, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SX130 IS because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Canon SX130 IS will result in more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The younger SX130 IS will have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus E-300 sensor size comparison

Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus E-300 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus E-300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX130 IS Portrait photography information
Olympus E-300 Portrait photography information
29
manual focus
external flash not possible
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
48
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon SX130 IS
Street photography with Olympus E-300
58
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (308 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Canon SX130 IS as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
27
built in image stabilization (Optical)
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
no liveview
max frames per second low (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Canon SX130 IS Travel photography features
Olympus E-300 Travel photography features
61
lighter than competition (308 grams)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
very long zoom (336mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
low resolution (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
45
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse function
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX130 IS Landscape photography advice
Olympus E-300 Landscape photography advice
42
manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
43
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (1.8")
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
lack of Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX130 IS Vlogging information
Olympus E-300 Vlogging information
29
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (308 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone socket
9
no video
Photography Glossary

Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus E-300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX130 IS and Olympus E-300
 Canon PowerShot SX130 ISOlympus E-300
General Information
Company Canon Olympus
Model type Canon PowerShot SX130 IS Olympus E-300
Also Known as - EVOLT E-300
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Introduced 2010-08-19 2005-01-10
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Digic 4 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 8MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 4:3
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 3264 x 2448
Maximum native ISO 1600 400
Maximum boosted ISO - 1600
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 3
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 28-336mm (12.0x) -
Max aperture f/3.4-5.6 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Available lenses - 45
Crop factor 5.8 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 1.8"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 134k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2500 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 160 x 120 (15 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video file format H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 308g (0.68 lbs) 624g (1.38 lbs)
Dimensions 113 x 73 x 46mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.8") 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus Compact Flash (Type I or II)
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $250 $800