Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus E-PL3
86 Imaging
40 Features
45 Overall
42
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus E-PL3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-448mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 291g - 111 x 73 x 44mm
- Released June 2013
- Superseded the Canon SX150 IS
- Renewed by Canon SX170 IS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL2
Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus E-PL3 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Canon SX160 IS versus Olympus E-PL3, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Canon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the SX160 IS (16MP) and E-PL3 (12MP) and the SX160 IS (1/2.3") and E-PL3 (Four Thirds) use different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SX160 IS was introduced 22 months later than the E-PL3 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX160 IS being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the SX160 IS grades vs the E-PL3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus E-PL3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX160 IS & Olympus PEN E-PL3. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX160 IS Gallery & Olympus E-PL3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX160 IS over the Olympus E-PL3
SX160 IS | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2013 | September 2011 | Fresher by 22 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Canon SX160 IS
E-PL3 | SX160 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX160 IS and Olympus E-PL3
SX160 IS | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus E-PL3 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX160 IS offers exterior measurements of 111mm x 73mm x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") along with a weight of 291 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL3 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX160 IS versus Olympus E-PL3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the SX160 IS and the E-PL3.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX160 IS and E-PL3 is 86 and 88 respectively.
Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus E-PL3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing purely by going through specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX160 IS and E-PL3.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SX160 IS using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Canon SX160 IS will show more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The younger SX160 IS provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus E-PL3 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Olympus PEN E-PL3 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2013-06-21 | 2011-09-20 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 4 | Truepic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 28-448mm (16.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 291 grams (0.64 lbs) | 313 grams (0.69 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 73 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 52 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 499 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | 300 photos |
Battery type | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 2 x AA | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $199 | $399 |