Clicky

Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Touch

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
43
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS front
 
Kodak EasyShare Touch front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35

Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Touch Key Specs

Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
  • 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
  • Revealed March 2013
  • Replaced the Canon SX260 HS
  • Refreshed by Canon SX280 HS
Kodak Touch
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Touch Overview

Here is a in depth comparison of the Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Touch, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Canon and Kodak. The image resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the Touch (14MP) is pretty close but the SX270 HS (1/2.3") and Touch (1/3") enjoy totally different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The SX270 HS was brought out 2 years later than the Touch and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX270 HS being a Compact camera and the Kodak Touch being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the SX270 HS grades versus the Touch with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Kodak Touch

 SX270 HS Touch 
LaunchedMarch 2013January 2011Fresher by 27 months
Manual focus Very accurate focusing
Screen resolution461k460kClearer screen (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Canon SX270 HS

 Touch SX270 HS 
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Kodak Touch

 SX270 HS Touch 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen size
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Touch Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon SX270 HS enjoys outer measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Kodak Touch has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).

Examine the Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Touch in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the SX270 HS versus the Touch.

Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Touch size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SX270 HS and Touch is 91 and 95 respectively.

Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Touch top view buttons comparison

Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Touch Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing purely by looking through specs. The visual here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SX270 HS and Touch.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SX270 HS due to its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Kodak Touch will provide you with more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The newer SX270 HS will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Touch sensor size comparison

Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Touch Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Touch Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX270 HS Portrait photography features
Kodak Touch Portrait photography features
34
manual focus
has face detect focus
can't use external flash
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
33
good resolution (14 megapixels)
offers face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/3")
no RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Canon SX270 HS as a Street photography camera
Kodak Touch as a Street photography camera
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (233g)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
48
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/3")
no RAW support
more heavy than others (150 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Canon SX270 HS Sports photography factors
Kodak Touch Sports photography factors
36
long zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking focus
slow fps (4.0 frames/s)
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (210 shots)
no phase detect auto focus
28
good resolution (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/3")
no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Canon SX270 HS Travel photography highlights
Kodak Touch Travel photography highlights
61
lighter than competition in class (233 grams)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
long reach (500mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
not so great battery pack (210 CIPA)
low MP (12 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
68
good resolution (14MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than others (150 grams)
does not feature selfie friendly display
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX270 HS Landscape photography information
Kodak Touch Landscape photography information
41
manual focus
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
not so great battery pack (210 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
42
relatively wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/3")
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX270 HS Vlogging factors
Kodak Touch Vlogging factors
34
reasonably wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (233 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
doesn't have mic support
31
relatively wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
touchscreen functionality
offers face detect autofocus
does not feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone port
more heavy than others (150g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon SX270 HS vs Kodak Touch Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX270 HS and Kodak Touch
 Canon PowerShot SX270 HSKodak EasyShare Touch
General Information
Make Canon Kodak
Model type Canon PowerShot SX270 HS Kodak EasyShare Touch
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Revealed 2013-03-21 2011-01-04
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Digic 6 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 4.8 x 3.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 17.3mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 6400 1600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-500mm (20.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-6.8 -
Macro focusing range 5cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 7.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 461k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter speed 4.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 3.20 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 233 gr (0.51 lb) 150 gr (0.33 lb)
Dimensions 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-6L KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $284 $100