Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus FE-45
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus FE-45 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Launched March 2013
- Earlier Model is Canon SX260 HS
- Refreshed by Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 142g - 94 x 62 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2009
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus FE-45 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus FE-45, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the FE-45 (10MP) is pretty similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX270 HS was revealed 4 years after the FE-45 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the SX270 HS matches up vs the FE-45 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus FE-45 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS and Olympus FE-45. The full galleries are available at Canon SX270 HS Gallery and Olympus FE-45 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Olympus FE-45
| SX270 HS | FE-45 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2013 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 52 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-45 over the Canon SX270 HS
| FE-45 | SX270 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Olympus FE-45
| SX270 HS | FE-45 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus FE-45 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon SX270 HS features external dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-45 has proportions of 94mm x 62mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus FE-45 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the SX270 HS and the FE-45.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX270 HS and FE-45 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus FE-45 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes just by going over specs. The pic here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX270 HS and FE-45.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Canon SX270 HS to deliver more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher SX270 HS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus FE-45 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon SX270 HS vs Olympus FE-45 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Olympus FE-45 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Olympus FE-45 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-03-21 | 2009-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 233g (0.51 lb) | 142g (0.31 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 94 x 62 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $284 | $130 |
