Clicky

Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus E-M1

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
43
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot SX280 HS front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 front
Portability
71
Imaging
53
Features
85
Overall
65

Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus E-M1 Key Specs

Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
  • 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
  • Released March 2013
  • Succeeded the Canon SX270 HS
Olympus E-M1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
  • Launched October 2013
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 II
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus E-M1 Overview

Lets look a little more in depth at the Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus E-M1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Canon and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the SX280 HS (12MP) and E-M1 (16MP) and the SX280 HS (1/2.3") and E-M1 (Four Thirds) offer different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The SX280 HS was launched 7 months earlier than the E-M1 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Canon SX280 HS being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the SX280 HS scores vs the E-M1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX280 HS over the Olympus E-M1

 SX280 HS E-M1 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Canon SX280 HS

 E-M1 SX280 HS 
LaunchedOctober 2013March 2013Fresher by 7 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1037k461kClearer display (+576k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Canon SX280 HS and Olympus E-M1

 SX280 HS E-M1 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus E-M1 Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon SX280 HS has got physical measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 has proportions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") and a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs).

Check the Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus E-M1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the SX280 HS versus the E-M1.

Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus E-M1 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX280 HS and E-M1 is 91 and 71 respectively.

Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus E-M1 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus E-M1 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing merely by checking out specifications. The photograph underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SX280 HS and E-M1.

Plainly, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SX280 HS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus E-M1 will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older SX280 HS will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus E-M1 sensor size comparison

Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon SX280 HS
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1
34
you can focus manually
has face detect focus
external flash not possible
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
71
has manual focus
flash sync is higher than normal (1/320 seconds)
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Canon SX280 HS Street photography highlights
Olympus E-M1 Street photography highlights
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (233 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
78
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
has focus via touch
environment proofing
lighter than competition in class (497g)
good high ISO (25,600)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Canon SX280 HS Sports photography features
Olympus E-M1 Sports photography features
36
incredible zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery (210 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
70
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
environment proofing
has phase detect AF
bad battery (350 per charge)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Canon SX280 HS Travel photography details
Olympus E-M1 Travel photography details
61
lighter than competitors (233g)
flash built-in
decently wide (25mm)
great reach (500mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
terrible battery (210 per charge)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
65
lighter than competition in class (497g)
environment proofing
has focus via touch
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
bad battery (350 per charge)
screen is not selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX280 HS Landscape photography highlights
Olympus E-M1 Landscape photography highlights
41
you can focus manually
decently wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
terrible battery (210 shots)
does not have Time Lapse function
73
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
environment proofing
bad battery (350 shots)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX280 HS Vlogging information
Olympus E-M1 Vlogging information
34
decently wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (233g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
does not have mic support
36
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has external mic jack
lighter than competition in class (497g)
screen is not selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus E-M1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX280 HS and Olympus E-M1
 Canon PowerShot SX280 HSOlympus OM-D E-M1
General Information
Make Canon Olympus
Model type Canon PowerShot SX280 HS Olympus OM-D E-M1
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Pro Mirrorless
Released 2013-03-21 2013-10-28
Body design Compact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic 6 TruePIC VII
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 25600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 81
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 25-500mm (20.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.5-6.8 -
Macro focusing range 5cm -
Number of lenses - 107
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 461k dot 1,037k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/8000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 4.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.50 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/320 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 233 gr (0.51 lbs) 497 gr (1.10 lbs)
Physical dimensions 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 73
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.0
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.7
DXO Low light rating not tested 757
Other
Battery life 210 photographs 350 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NB-6L BLN-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $325 $799