Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Launched March 2013
- Old Model is Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Canon SX280 HS versus Olympus TG-830 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the SX280 HS (12MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX280 HS was launched 3 months later than the TG-830 iHS which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the SX280 HS scores versus the TG-830 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX280 HS & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX280 HS Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX280 HS over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| SX280 HS | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Canon SX280 HS
| TG-830 iHS | SX280 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX280 HS and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| SX280 HS | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2013 | January 2013 | Same age | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Canon SX280 HS enjoys physical measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus TG-830 iHS has specifications of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
See the Canon SX280 HS versus Olympus TG-830 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the SX280 HS against the TG-830 iHS.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SX280 HS and TG-830 iHS is 91 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing only by viewing specifications. The visual below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX280 HS and TG-830 iHS.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus TG-830 iHS to result in extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively.
Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-03-21 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 233 gr (0.51 lb) | 214 gr (0.47 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6L | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $325 | $0 |