Canon SX420 IS vs Panasonic FS12
80 Imaging
46 Features
34 Overall
41
95 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Canon SX420 IS vs Panasonic FS12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-1008mm (F3.5-6.6) lens
- 325g - 104 x 69 x 85mm
- Announced January 2016
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched April 2009
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Canon SX420 IS vs Panasonic FS12 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Canon SX420 IS vs Panasonic FS12, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Canon and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the SX420 IS (20MP) and FS12 (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SX420 IS was announced 6 years later than the FS12 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX420 IS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Panasonic FS12 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the SX420 IS grades against the FS12 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX420 IS vs Panasonic FS12 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX420 IS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX420 IS Gallery and Panasonic FS12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX420 IS over the Panasonic FS12
| SX420 IS | FS12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2016 |  | April 2009 | Fresher by 82 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Canon SX420 IS
| FS12 | SX420 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX420 IS and Panasonic FS12
| SX420 IS | FS12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX420 IS vs Panasonic FS12 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon SX420 IS comes with outer dimensions of 104mm x 69mm x 85mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.3") having a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) and the Panasonic FS12 has measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX420 IS vs Panasonic FS12 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the SX420 IS against the FS12.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the SX420 IS and FS12 is 80 and 95 respectively.
Canon SX420 IS vs Panasonic FS12 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing merely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX420 IS and FS12.
As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Canon SX420 IS to provide greater detail with its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern SX420 IS will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Canon SX420 IS vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX420 IS vs Panasonic FS12 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX420 IS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Panasonic |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX420 IS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2016-01-05 | 2009-04-17 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5152 x 3864 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1008mm (42.0x) | 31-124mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 0.5 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 6.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, slow synchro, flash off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 325 grams (0.72 lb) | 129 grams (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 69 x 85mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.3") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 195 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-11LH | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $299 | $228 |
