Canon SX60 HS vs Olympus E-M1 II
61 Imaging
41 Features
67 Overall
51
68 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
Canon SX60 HS vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-1365mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 650g - 128 x 93 x 114mm
- Launched September 2014
- Superseded the Canon SX50 HS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Canon SX60 HS vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Canon SX60 HS vs Olympus E-M1 II, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the SX60 HS (16MP) and the E-M1 II (20MP) is very comparable but the SX60 HS (1/2.3") and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) come with different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SX60 HS was manufactured 24 months earlier than the E-M1 II making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX60 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the SX60 HS matches up vs the E-M1 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon SX60 HS vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX60 HS and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX60 HS Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX60 HS over the Olympus E-M1 II
SX60 HS | E-M1 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Canon SX60 HS
E-M1 II | SX60 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | September 2014 | Newer by 24 months | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 922k | Clearer display (+115k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX60 HS and Olympus E-M1 II
SX60 HS | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies |
Canon SX60 HS vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Canon SX60 HS comes with outside measurements of 128mm x 93mm x 114mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 4.5") along with a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 II has specifications of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Check the Canon SX60 HS vs Olympus E-M1 II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the SX60 HS versus the E-M1 II.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SX60 HS and E-M1 II is 61 and 68 respectively.
Canon SX60 HS vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions purely by going through specifications. The pic here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX60 HS and E-M1 II.
To sum up, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The SX60 HS due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus E-M1 II will show greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SX60 HS will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX60 HS vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX60 HS vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX60 HS | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX60 HS | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-09-16 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DIGIC 6 | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 21-1365mm (65.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 922k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 922k dot | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.4 frames per sec | 60.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MOV, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 650 gr (1.43 lb) | 574 gr (1.27 lb) |
Dimensions | 128 x 93 x 114mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 4.5") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 39 | 80 |
DXO Color Depth score | 19.2 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | 12.8 |
DXO Low light score | 127 | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 350 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-10L | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | Single | Dual |
Launch price | $549 | $1,700 |