Canon SX620 HS vs Kodak Z950
93 Imaging
46 Features
48 Overall
46
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Canon SX620 HS vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-625mm (F3.2-6.6) lens
- 182g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Introduced May 2016
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Launched June 2010
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon SX620 HS vs Kodak Z950 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Canon SX620 HS and Kodak Z950, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Kodak. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the SX620 HS (20MP) and Z950 (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX620 HS was released 5 years later than the Z950 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the SX620 HS scores vs the Z950 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX620 HS vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX620 HS & Kodak EasyShare Z950. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX620 HS Gallery & Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX620 HS over the Kodak Z950
| SX620 HS | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2016 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 72 months |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Canon SX620 HS
| Z950 | SX620 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX620 HS and Kodak Z950
| SX620 HS | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Canon SX620 HS vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX620 HS features external dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z950 has dimensions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Canon SX620 HS and Kodak Z950 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the SX620 HS compared to the Z950.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SX620 HS and Z950 is 93 and 89 respectively.
Canon SX620 HS vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching specifications. The graphic here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX620 HS and Z950.
To sum up, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Canon SX620 HS to provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent SX620 HS should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Canon SX620 HS vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX620 HS vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX620 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Kodak |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX620 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2016-05-10 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-625mm (25.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-6.6 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 6cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.5 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 5.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 182 grams (0.40 lb) | 243 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 295 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $279 | $250 |
