Clicky

Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus E-500

Portability
89
Imaging
46
Features
51
Overall
48
Canon PowerShot SX710 HS front
 
Olympus E-500 front
Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38

Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus E-500 Key Specs

Canon SX710 HS
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-750mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
  • 269g - 113 x 66 x 35mm
  • Introduced January 2015
  • Superseded the Canon SX700 HS
  • Refreshed by Canon SX720 HS
Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Launched October 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Later Model is Olympus E-510
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus E-500 Overview

Let's look more closely at the Canon SX710 HS versus Olympus E-500, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Canon and Olympus. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the SX710 HS (20MP) and E-500 (8MP) and the SX710 HS (1/2.3") and E-500 (Four Thirds) boast different sensor dimensions.

YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

The SX710 HS was released 9 years later than the E-500 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX710 HS being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the SX710 HS matches up vs the E-500 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX710 HS over the Olympus E-500

 SX710 HS E-500 
LaunchedJanuary 2015October 2005Fresher by 113 months
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution922k215kCrisper display (+707k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Canon SX710 HS

 E-500 SX710 HS 

Common features in the Canon SX710 HS and Olympus E-500

 SX710 HS E-500 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus E-500 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon SX710 HS has got physical measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Olympus E-500 has sizing of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs).

Analyze the Canon SX710 HS versus Olympus E-500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the SX710 HS and the E-500.

Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus E-500 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX710 HS and E-500 is 89 and 70 respectively.

Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus E-500 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus E-500 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing technical specs. The photograph here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SX710 HS and E-500.

As you can tell, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SX710 HS because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Canon SX710 HS will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The fresher SX710 HS provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus E-500 sensor size comparison

Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus E-500 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus E-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon SX710 HS
Portrait photography with Olympus E-500
47
focusing manually
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
includes face detection focusing
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
49
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no liveview feature
low resolution (8 megapixels)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Canon SX710 HS Street photography factors
Olympus E-500 Street photography factors
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (269g)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
57
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (479g)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Canon SX710 HS Sports photography highlights
Olympus E-500 Sports photography highlights
48
excellent zoom range (25-750mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
slow fps (6.0 frames/s)
small sensor (1/2.3")
not so great battery (230 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect AF
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
no liveview feature
low frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (8 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Canon SX710 HS Travel photography advice
Olympus E-500 Travel photography advice
67
lighter than average (269 grams)
MP count decent (20MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
very long zoom (750mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
not so great battery (230 CIPA)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
52
lighter than competition in class (479g)
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse function
low resolution (8 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX710 HS Landscape photography highlights
Olympus E-500 Landscape photography highlights
50
focusing manually
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
not so great battery (230 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
43
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
small screen (2.5 inch)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (8 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
does not have Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX710 HS as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-500 as a Vlogging camera
34
reasonably wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average (269g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone support
9
can't record video
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon SX710 HS vs Olympus E-500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX710 HS and Olympus E-500
 Canon PowerShot SX710 HSOlympus E-500
General Information
Make Canon Olympus
Model type Canon PowerShot SX710 HS Olympus E-500
Also called - EVOLT E-500
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Introduced 2015-01-06 2005-10-21
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Chip DIGIC 6 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 8 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 3264 x 2448
Maximum native ISO 3200 400
Maximum boosted ISO - 1600
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 9 3
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 25-750mm (30.0x) -
Largest aperture f/3.2-6.9 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 45
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.5 inch
Resolution of display 922k dot 215k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.45x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 6.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 13.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, on, off, slow synchro Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 269 gr (0.59 lbs) 479 gr (1.06 lbs)
Physical dimensions 113 x 66 x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 230 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-6LH -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $349 $600