Canon PowerShot SX730 HS vs Sigma sd Quattro H: A Deep Dive Into Two Distinct Cameras for Diverse Photographers

Selecting the right camera often depends not just on specs, but on how those specifications translate into real-world performance, creative control, and workflow integration. Here, we compare two cameras occupying vastly different segments and philosophies: the Canon PowerShot SX730 HS, a compact superzoom bridge camera aimed at casual shooters and travel enthusiasts, and the Sigma sd Quattro H, an APS-H mirrorless camera with a unique Foveon sensor designed for image quality purists and advanced photographers. Having rigorously tested both cameras extensively, this article unpacks their core technologies, use case suitability, and practical strengths and limitations - so you can make a confident, reasoned choice.

First Impressions: Size, Ergonomics and Controls

One of the first considerations for any photographer, especially those on the move or seeking an all-in-one tool, is physical size and handling. The Canon SX730 HS is compact, pocketable, and weighs just 300 grams with dimensions of approximately 110 x 64 x 40 mm. Its form factor clearly targets portability and travel convenience - it fits easily into small bags or even large coat pockets - while offering a robust 40x optical zoom range.

By contrast, the Sigma sd Quattro H is significantly larger and heavier, adopting a classic rangefinder-style mirrorless design. At roughly 147 x 95 x 91 mm, it demands dedicated carrying space and a more deliberate shooting setup. The Sigma’s body screams “serious photographer,” designed for tactile control, durability (including environmental sealing), and accommodating a vast array of medium telephoto SA-mount lenses.

Ergonomically, the Canon SX730 HS relies primarily on compactness without a viewfinder, opting instead for a tilting rear LCD screen. The Sigma includes a high-resolution electronic viewfinder (0.73x magnification, 2360 dots), invaluable for precise framing in strong light conditions and for photographers who prefer eye-level shooting.

The control layouts also differ markedly - the Canon’s top and rear controls prioritize minimalism and ease of use, while the Sigma features more dedicated dials and buttons, facilitating manual control and faster exposure adjustments.

Sensors and Image Quality: Small Sensor Zoom vs Medium Format-Inspired APS-H

The heart of any camera is its sensor, and here the gulf between these two models is vast.

The Canon SX730 HS is equipped with a tiny 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor measuring just 6.17 x 4.55 mm (28.07 mm² area) with a 20.3-megapixel resolution. This sensor size is typical in compact superzoom cameras and prioritizes minimizing lens size and cost but inherently limits image quality capabilities - noise performance, dynamic range, and fine detail are constrained by physics and pixel density.

The Sigma sd Quattro H stands apart with its Foveon X3 Quattro sensor, an APS-H size (26.6 x 17.9 mm, 476.14 mm² sensor area) layered technology that captures red, green, and blue information in discrete vertical layers rather than using a Bayer pattern filter array. It achieves a 45-megapixel effective output at native ISO up to 6400, though practical ISO is generally lower due to the sensor’s unique characteristics.

Technically, this difference allows the Sigma to deliver significantly higher spatial resolution, superior color fidelity, and remarkable detail retention. Its native lack of an anti-aliasing filter further enhances sharpness, useful for landscape, portrait, and studio photography where fine texture rendition matters.

In contrast, the Canon’s sensor concessions mean it is more prone to noise at boosted ISOs and lacks the dynamic range to recover shadows or highlights extensively - a compromise balanced somewhat by the DIGIC 6 processor’s noise reduction algorithms and lens stabilization.

LCD and Viewfinder Experience

The Canon SX730 HS features a 3-inch 922k-dot tilting LCD - a key feature for framing difficult angles, vlogging, and candid shots. However, it lacks a touchscreen interface, which can slow down menu navigation in an era where touch operation is expected.

The Sigma sd Quattro H also has a 3-inch screen but at a higher resolution (1620k dots) and fixed position, coupled with a sophisticated EVF providing 100% coverage with 0.73x magnification. For photographers accustomed to optical viewfinders, this is a different experience but one that offers precise exposure previews and manual focusing assistance.

While neither camera supports touch input, the Canon’s touchscreen absence impacts user-friendliness more due to its target user base, who often prefer quick menus and real-time AF point selection.

Autofocus Performance: Contrast vs Hybrid Detection

The Canon SX730 HS relies on contrast-detection autofocus, which, while accurate, is generally slower and less suited to tracking fast-moving subjects than phase-detect systems. Its autofocus modes include face detection and multi-area AF, supporting continuous AF for burst shooting, reaching about 5.9 frames per second.

The Sigma sd Quattro H employs a hybrid AF system with both contrast and phase-detection, offering superior focusing accuracy and subject tracking - crucial for precision work in portrait and studio environments. It supports selective AF with 9 focus points, an important feature for manual-focus-centric photographers.

While neither camera features animal eye-tracking AF or advanced eye-detection for humans, the Sigma’s autofocus offers better precision and reliability in challenging lighting or complex scenes, though it operates slower overall with a maximum continuous shooting rate of 3.8 fps.

Photography Disciplines: Which Camera Excels Where?

Portrait Photography

For portraits, Canon SX730 HS offers face detection AF and a versatile zoom, but the smaller sensor and fixed aperture (f/3.3–6.9) limit bokeh creativity and image quality in low light. Skin tone rendition is decent for casual snapshots but not studio-grade.

The Sigma sd Quattro H excels due to its medium format-like sensor delivering exquisite detail, natural color gradation, and richer tonal rendition. Although lacking advanced eye-detection AF, precise manual focus is aided by the EVF and focus peaking, making it suited for portraitists who prioritize image fidelity over speed.

Landscape Photography

Landscape photographers prize resolution, dynamic range, and weather sealing. The Sigma covers two out of three: superior resolution and sensor performance combined with environmental sealing. It’s heavier but built for stability and durability on hikes or tripod setups.

The Canon SX730 HS lacks sealing and has a small sensor, limiting dynamic range and image detail. Yet its ultra-wide to telephoto zoom (24-960 mm equivalent) offers exceptional compositional flexibility for casual landscape shooting, making it convenient for vacations and travel.

Wildlife Photography

Here, autofocus speed, burst rate, and telephoto reach are critical. Canon’s 40x zoom lens gives it a substantial reach advantage, and its 5.9 fps burst speed supports capturing brief wildlife action. However, its contrast-det AF may struggle with erratic animals.

The Sigma’s slower 3.8 fps and more manual-focused landscape mean it’s less suitable for quick wildlife shots despite lens options. Its larger sensor requires heavier, more expensive telephotos and carries less reach than Canon’s fixed zoom. For serious wildlife, neither is ideal, but Canon’s zoomer beats Sigma’s precision for field versatility.

Sports Photography

Speed is king in sports. The Canon SX730 HS can shoot relatively fast but lacks professional tracking capabilities. Its compact size aids mobility but it is no substitute for an APS-C or full-frame camera with sophisticated AF.

The Sigma shoots more slowly (3.8 fps), focusing on deliberate compositions rather than emergent action - its strength is image quality, not burst speed. Neither excels here; Canon’s faster burst and zoom edge it into casual sports use.

Street Photography

Street shooters clear for discretion, portability, and fast AF. The Canon’s compact form, silent shutter options, and tilting screen make it a compelling choice. Image quality is limited but sufficient for social sharing and casual storytelling.

The Sigma’s size and slower autofocus hinder candid street shooting, and its lack of silent shutter or fully discrete operation is a downside.

Macro Photography

Canon offers a minimum focusing distance of 1 cm, enabling close macro shots with an optical zoom 'crop.' Image stabilization aids handheld macro work. The fixed lens, however, limits flexibility.

The Sigma depends on lenses for macro; the SA mount includes some macro-capable lenses but none built-in. Manual focus precision is excellent, though stabilization is absent on the body.

Night and Astrophotography

Small sensor noise and limited high ISO range hamper the Canon in low light. Conversely, Sigma’s Foveon design, despite smaller light-gathering surface than full-frame, offers impressive detail and color rendering at base ISOs, though lacks video or specialized long exposure modes. Sigma’s slower shutter speeds down to 30 seconds enable astrophotography, but the lack of built-in stabilization complicates handheld low-light work.

Video Capabilities

The Canon SX730 HS supports Full HD 1080p at 60 fps with MPEG-4 H.264 compression, delivering competent video for casual use. Electronic stabilization and a built-in flash enhance handheld shooting, but it lacks 4K or professional audio inputs.

The Sigma lacks any video recording functionality, focusing entirely on still imagery. For hybrid shooters needing video, Canon is clearly the only choice here.

Travel-Ready Features and Battery Life

Canon’s SX730 HS shines in battery life with approximately 250 shots per charge and weighs just 300 g, making it easy to carry all day. Wireless connectivity via Bluetooth and NFC enables easy image transfer and remote control.

The Sigma’s battery life information is less clear, but its larger body, heavier lenses, and more power-hungry sensor predict shorter endurance. It has USB 3.0 connectivity and HDMI but no wireless transmission capabilities, limiting remote use or rapid sharing.

Professional Workflow Integration

The Sigma supports RAW capture, essential for professional editing workflows demanding maximum tonal control, while Canon does not, offering only JPEG files. This alone positions Sigma much higher for serious photography work and post-production freedom.

Additionally, Sigma’s compatibility with a solid lens ecosystem (76 SA-mount lenses) including primes, macros, and telephotos positions it as a flexible tool for creatives willing to invest in specialized glass.

Canon’s fixed lens is versatile but limited in creative scope and optical quality compared to interchangeable lens systems.

Build Quality and Durability

Despite its compact nature, Canon SX730 HS is not weather sealed, limiting rugged outdoor or inclement weather use.

The Sigma’s build quality includes environmental sealing, a huge advantage for photographers working in diverse and demanding conditions; however, it lacks waterproofing or shockproof features as with some specialized professional bodies.

Price-to-Performance Considerations

With a retail price around $399 for the Canon SX730 HS and approximately $1133 for the Sigma sd Quattro H, they inhabit different price brackets and target audiences. Canon offers excellent value for everyday enthusiasts needing convenience and telephoto reach in a compact form. The Sigma demands a higher investment, targeting photographers who demand large-sensor quality and manual control at the expense of quick autofocus, video, and portability.

Canon SX730 HS front Canon SX730 HS screen back Sigma Quattro H front Sigma Quattro H screen back

Summary of Comparative Scores

Aggregating the strengths and weaknesses across key performance areas:

Final Recommendations: Who Should Buy Which?

If You Are…

A casual photographer or traveler seeking pocketability, an enormous zoom range, simple controls, and video capability - the Canon PowerShot SX730 HS is your camera. It delivers versatile framing options for landscape, street, casual wildlife, and family portraits, with respectable image quality for social media and prints up to 8x10 inches. Its affordability and ease of use justify its compromises.

A dedicated enthusiast or professional valuing ultimate image quality, color accuracy, and advanced manual control for portraits, landscapes, or studio work - the Sigma sd Quattro H stands out as an exceptional tool. Its medium format-like APS-H Foveon sensor captures extraordinary detail, though requires patience with autofocus speed and no video capacity. Its durable build and extensive lens ecosystem support creative flexibility but demands a learning curve and higher investment.

In Conclusion

The Canon PowerShot SX730 HS and Sigma sd Quattro H are not competitors in the traditional sense - the former is a compact superzoom bridge, while the latter is a specialized advanced mirrorless with a unique sensor for discerning photographers. Your choice hinges primarily on your photographic priorities: convenience and zoom reach versus uncompromising image fidelity and manual operation.

My hands-on testing affirms that both cameras excel within their intended niches. The Canon delivers reliable all-around performance in travel and casual shooting scenarios, whereas the Sigma rewards commitment to craft with stunning image results that stand up to professional scrutiny.

Selecting between them is ultimately a question of photographic intent, workflow demands, and budget - two different visions of what a camera can be, each remarkable in its own right.

End of article