Clicky

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak M320

Portability
96
Imaging
36
Features
43
Overall
38
Canon SX220 HS front
 
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak M320 Key Specs

Canon SX220 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • n/ag - 106 x 59 x 33mm
  • Introduced February 2011
Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Announced January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak M320 Overview

Below, we will be reviewing the Canon SX220 HS versus Kodak M320, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Canon and Kodak. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the SX220 HS (12MP) and M320 (9MP) and the SX220 HS (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") use different sensor measurements.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The SX220 HS was released 2 years after the M320 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX220 HS being a Compact camera and the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summary of how the SX220 HS grades vs the M320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX220 HS over the Kodak M320

 SX220 HS M320 
AnnouncedFebruary 2011January 2009More modern by 26 months
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution461k230kCrisper screen (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Canon SX220 HS

 M320 SX220 HS 

Common features in the Canon SX220 HS and Kodak M320

 SX220 HS M320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX220 HS offers outside measurements of 106mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Kodak M320 has proportions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Look at the Canon SX220 HS versus Kodak M320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the SX220 HS versus the M320.

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak M320 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX220 HS and M320 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak M320 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes only by reviewing specs. The picture underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SX220 HS and M320.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The SX220 HS because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Canon SX220 HS will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The younger SX220 HS should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak M320 sensor size comparison

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak M320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon SX220 HS
Portrait photography with Kodak M320
38
focusing manually
above average flash sync (1/2,000s)
supports face detection focusing
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
19
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lack of RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon SX220 HS
Street photography with Kodak M320
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
47
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lack of RAW format
heavier than competition in class (155g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Canon SX220 HS Sports photography highlights
Kodak M320 Sports photography highlights
36
incredible zoom range (28-392mm 14.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery (210 shots)
does not have phase detect AF
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (9MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lack of phase detect AF
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Canon SX220 HS Travel photography info
Kodak M320 Travel photography info
60
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
long reach (392mm)
missing Timelapse mode
bad battery (210 shots)
low megapixels (12MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
50
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (155g)
resolution not great (9MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX220 HS Landscape photography features
Kodak M320 Landscape photography features
42
focusing manually
fairly wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
bad battery (210 per charge)
missing Timelapse mode
22
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (9MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX220 HS Vlogging details
Kodak M320 Vlogging details
34
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
missing external microphone port
22
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external mic port
heavier than competition in class (155 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon SX220 HS vs Kodak M320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX220 HS and Kodak M320
 Canon SX220 HSKodak EasyShare M320
General Information
Brand Canon Kodak
Model Canon SX220 HS Kodak EasyShare M320
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Introduced 2011-02-07 2009-01-08
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 9MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 3472 x 2604
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-392mm (14.0x) 34-102mm (3.0x)
Max aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/2.8-5.1
Macro focus distance 5cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 6.3
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 461k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology PureColor II TG TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/1400 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.50 m 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/2000 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30,120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight - 155g (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 106 x 59 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-5L KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/ MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $399 $39